Seek Returns

CCJ vs. PSX: Cameco vs. Phillips 66 Stock Comparison

How do Cameco (CCJ) and Phillips 66 (PSX) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cameco (CCJ) and Phillips 66 (PSX) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CCJ is classified under Coal & Consumable Fuels while PSX falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.

Company profile comparison for Cameco (CCJ) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
Profile ItemCCJPSX
NameCameco CorporationPhillips 66
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryCoal & Consumable FuelsOil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Capitalization31.05 billion USD95.85 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 14, 1996April 12, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CCJ
PSX
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCCJPSX
Total Return (1Y)-18.97%88.91%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)21.14%36.18%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)22.20%30.83%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CCJ
PSX
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCCJPSX
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)51.10%33.42%
Beta (5Y)1.180.72
Max Drawdown (5Y)-49.04%-44.37%
Avg. Volume (3M)3.27M2.92M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CCJ and PSX are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCCJPSX
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.462.53
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.643.93

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 39.84% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Cameco (CCJ) at 5.68% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PSX.

CCJ

Energy industry group

5.68%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
CCJ
5.68%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

PSX

Energy industry group

39.84%

Max
53.85%
PSX
39.84%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 11.43% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.48% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

11.43%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
CCJ
11.43%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

PSX

Energy industry group

7.48%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
PSX
7.48%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 9.23% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 13.17% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CCJ

Energy industry group

9.23%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
CCJ
9.23%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

PSX

Energy industry group

13.17%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
PSX
13.17%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCCJPSX
ROE (TTM)5.68%39.84%
ROA (TTM)2.79%10.64%
Net Margin (TTM)11.43%7.48%
Operating Margin (TTM)9.23%13.17%
Gross Margin (TTM)33.83%15.08%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Cameco (CCJ) at 11.04% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at -7.53% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both companies show strong earnings momentum, but Cameco (CCJ) at 246.15% is the standout with EPS growth above its industry range; Phillips 66 (PSX) at 116.23% also sits in the top quartile.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCCJPSX
Revenue Growth (YoY)11.04%-7.53%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)23.07%-8.00%
EPS Growth (YoY)246.15%116.23%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)83.08%-22.60%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 1.34 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Cameco (CCJ) at 2.55 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

2.55

Max
3.64
CCJ
2.55
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

PSX

Energy industry group

1.34

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
PSX
1.34
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Cameco (CCJ) at 0.14 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.52 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.14

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
CCJ
0.14
Min
0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.52

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
PSX
0.52
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCCJPSX
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.551.34
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.140.52
Net Debt / EBITDA0.190.82

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 0.35% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.03% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.35%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
CCJ
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

2.03%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
PSX
2.03%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 26.37% and Phillips 66 (PSX) at 16.07% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CCJ

Energy industry group

26.37%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
CCJ
26.37%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PSX

Energy industry group

16.07%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
PSX
16.07%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCCJPSX
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.35%2.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.37%16.07%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 7.88 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 108.03 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for CCJ’s trailing earnings.

CCJ

Energy industry group

108.03

CCJ
108.03
Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

PSX

Energy industry group

7.88

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
PSX
7.88
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Phillips 66 (PSX) at 0.57 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Cameco (CCJ) at 8.93 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.

CCJ

Energy industry group

8.93

CCJ
8.93
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

PSX

Energy industry group

0.57

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
PSX
0.57
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Both look rich against book: Phillips 66 (PSX) at 2.79 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Cameco (CCJ) at 6.03 prices even higher, above its industry range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

6.03

CCJ
6.03
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

PSX

Energy industry group

2.79

Max
4.21
PSX
2.79
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. Phillips 66 (PSX): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and Phillips 66 (PSX)
MetricCCJPSX
P/E Ratio (TTM)108.037.88
P/S Ratio (TTM)8.930.57
P/B Ratio (MRQ)6.032.79
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)0.63%9.93%