CCJ vs. LNG: Cameco vs. Cheniere Energy Stock Comparison
How do Cameco (CCJ) and Cheniere Energy (LNG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cameco (CCJ) and Cheniere Energy (LNG) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CCJ is classified under Coal & Consumable Fuels while LNG falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.
| Profile Item | CCJ | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cameco Corporation | Cheniere Energy Inc. |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Coal & Consumable Fuels | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 31.05 billion USD | 56.76 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 14, 1996 | April 4, 1994 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CCJ | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -18.97% | 36.89% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 21.14% | 19.36% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 22.20% | 22.59% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CCJ | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 51.10% | 31.41% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 0.06 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -49.04% | -24.87% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.27M | 2.00M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CCJ | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.46 | 1.04 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.64 | 1.54 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 39.68% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Cameco (CCJ) at 5.68% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for LNG.
CCJ
Energy industry group
5.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- CCJ
- 5.68%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
LNG
Energy industry group
39.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- LNG
- 39.68%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cameco (CCJ) at 11.43% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 13.40% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CCJ
Energy industry group
11.43%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CCJ
- 11.43%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
LNG
Energy industry group
13.40%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- LNG
- 13.40%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cameco (CCJ) at 9.23% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 30.82% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CCJ
Energy industry group
9.23%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- CCJ
- 9.23%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
LNG
Energy industry group
30.82%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- LNG
- 30.82%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CCJ | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 5.68% | 39.68% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.79% | 8.61% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.43% | 13.40% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 9.23% | 30.82% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.83% | 34.89% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 27.21% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Cameco (CCJ) at 11.04% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for LNG.
EPS Growth
Both companies show strong earnings momentum, but Cameco (CCJ) at 246.15% is the standout with EPS growth above its industry range; Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 69.93% also sits in the top quartile.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CCJ | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 11.04% | 27.21% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 23.07% | -15.77% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 246.15% | 69.93% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 83.08% | 62.34% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.90 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Cameco (CCJ) at 2.55 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
CCJ
Energy industry group
2.55
- Max
- 3.64
- CCJ
- 2.55
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
LNG
Energy industry group
0.90
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- LNG
- 0.90
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Cameco (CCJ) at 0.14 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.31 is above its industry debt-to-equity ratio range.
CCJ
Energy industry group
0.14
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- CCJ
- 0.14
- Min
- 0.00
LNG
Energy industry group
2.31
- LNG
- 2.31
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CCJ | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.55 | 0.90 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.14 | 2.31 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.19 | 3.26 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cameco (CCJ) at 0.35% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.82% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CCJ
Energy industry group
0.35%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- CCJ
- 0.35%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LNG
Energy industry group
0.82%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- LNG
- 0.82%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Cameco (CCJ) at 26.37% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 15.80% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CCJ
Energy industry group
26.37%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- CCJ
- 26.37%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LNG
Energy industry group
15.80%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- LNG
- 15.80%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CCJ | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.35% | 0.82% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 26.37% | 15.80% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 19.78 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 108.03 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for CCJ’s trailing earnings.
CCJ
Energy industry group
108.03
- CCJ
- 108.03
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
LNG
Energy industry group
19.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- LNG
- 19.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.50 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 8.93 clears its benchmark range — CCJ looks notably rich on sales.
CCJ
Energy industry group
8.93
- CCJ
- 8.93
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
LNG
Energy industry group
2.50
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- LNG
- 2.50
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Measured against book value, both Cameco (CCJ) at 6.03 and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 8.70 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.
CCJ
Energy industry group
6.03
- CCJ
- 6.03
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
LNG
Energy industry group
8.70
- LNG
- 8.70
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CCJ | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 108.03 | 19.78 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 8.93 | 2.50 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.03 | 8.70 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 0.63% | 3.17% |