Seek Returns logo

CCJ vs. GLNG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CCJ and GLNG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCCJGLNG
Company NameCameco CorporationGolar LNG Limited
CountryCanadaBermuda
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization33.69 billion USD4.59 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 14, 1996July 15, 2003
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CCJ and GLNG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CCJ vs. GLNG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCCJGLNG
5-Day Price Return3.23%-1.02%
13-Week Price Return30.84%4.76%
26-Week Price Return77.54%14.50%
52-Week Price Return90.10%33.88%
Month-to-Date Return3.28%6.46%
Year-to-Date Return50.59%3.54%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.11M1.35M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.04M1.44M
3-Month Volatility41.97%22.14%
Beta1.000.23

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CCJ

8.27%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
35.51%
Q3
17.86%
Median
10.69%
Q1
5.71%
Min
-8.98%

CCJ’s Return on Equity of 8.27% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GLNG

0.19%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
35.51%
Q3
17.86%
Median
10.69%
Q1
5.71%
Min
-8.98%

GLNG’s Return on Equity of 0.19% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CCJ vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CCJ

14.94%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
44.03%
Q3
20.12%
Median
8.91%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-23.39%

CCJ’s Net Profit Margin of 14.94% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GLNG

1.48%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
44.03%
Q3
20.12%
Median
8.91%
Q1
2.62%
Min
-23.39%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, GLNG’s Net Profit Margin of 1.48% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CCJ vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CCJ

17.73%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
64.72%
Q3
31.93%
Median
19.14%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-27.31%

CCJ’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.73% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GLNG

4.74%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
64.72%
Q3
31.93%
Median
19.14%
Q1
5.67%
Min
-27.31%

GLNG’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.74% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CCJ vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCCJGLNG
Return on Equity (TTM)8.27%0.19%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.59%0.09%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.94%1.48%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.73%4.74%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)26.54%52.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CCJ

2.96

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.22
Q1
0.84
Min
0.22

CCJ’s Current Ratio of 2.96 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

GLNG

0.85

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.76
Q3
1.64
Median
1.22
Q1
0.84
Min
0.22

GLNG’s Current Ratio of 0.85 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CCJ vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CCJ

0.15

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.60
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, CCJ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.15 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

GLNG

0.71

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.60
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

GLNG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.71 is typical for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CCJ vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CCJ

2.29

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
54.03
Q3
23.32
Median
7.46
Q1
2.57
Min
-19.25

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, CCJ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.29 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

GLNG

1.01

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
54.03
Q3
23.32
Median
7.46
Q1
2.57
Min
-19.25

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, GLNG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.01 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CCJ vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCCJGLNG
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.960.85
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.750.85
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.150.71
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.291.01

Growth

Revenue Growth

CCJ vs. GLNG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CCJ vs. GLNG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CCJ

0.00%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
13.98%
Q3
7.41%
Median
4.36%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.00%

CCJ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GLNG

2.36%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
13.98%
Q3
7.41%
Median
4.36%
Q1
2.84%
Min
0.00%

GLNG’s Dividend Yield of 2.36% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CCJ vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CCJ

51.41%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
180.73%
Q3
92.90%
Median
63.90%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

CCJ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 51.41% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GLNG

198.01%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
180.73%
Q3
92.90%
Median
63.90%
Q1
27.41%
Min
0.00%

At 198.01%, GLNG’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

CCJ vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCCJGLNG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.36%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)51.41%198.01%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CCJ

79.41

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.71
Q3
21.35
Median
12.26
Q1
7.77
Min
0.00

At 79.41, CCJ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

GLNG

1,138.35

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.71
Q3
21.35
Median
12.26
Q1
7.77
Min
0.00

At 1,138.35, GLNG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CCJ vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CCJ

11.87

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
5.87
Q3
2.89
Median
1.29
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 11.87, CCJ trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

GLNG

16.84

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
5.87
Q3
2.89
Median
1.29
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 16.84, GLNG trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CCJ vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CCJ

6.65

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.12
Median
1.34
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

At 6.65, CCJ’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GLNG

1.99

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.12
Median
1.34
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

GLNG’s P/B Ratio of 1.99 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CCJ vs. GLNG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCCJGLNG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)79.411,138.35
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)11.8716.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.651.99
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)46.60157.31