Seek Returns

CCJ vs. FTI: Cameco vs. TechnipFMC Stock Comparison

How do Cameco (CCJ) and TechnipFMC (FTI) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cameco (CCJ) and TechnipFMC (FTI) both fall under the Energy industry group, but CCJ is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels while FTI is classified in Energy Equipment & Services.

Company profile comparison for Cameco (CCJ) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
Profile ItemCCJFTI
NameCameco CorporationTechnipFMC plc
Country/RegionCanadaUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsEnergy Equipment & Services
GICS Sub-IndustryCoal & Consumable FuelsOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization31.05 billion USD24.70 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 14, 1996June 15, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CCJ
FTI
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and TechnipFMC (FTI). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and TechnipFMC (FTI). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
MetricCCJFTI
Total Return (1Y)-18.97%51.75%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)21.14%46.71%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)22.20%54.94%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CCJ
FTI
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cameco (CCJ) and TechnipFMC (FTI). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
MetricCCJFTI
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)51.10%32.65%
Beta (5Y)1.180.87
Max Drawdown (5Y)-49.04%-36.71%
Avg. Volume (3M)3.27M2.86M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CCJ and FTI are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
MetricCCJFTI
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.461.45
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.642.11

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 38.30% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Cameco (CCJ) at 5.68% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FTI.

CCJ

Energy industry group

5.68%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
CCJ
5.68%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

FTI

Energy industry group

38.30%

Max
53.85%
FTI
38.30%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 11.43% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 12.04% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

11.43%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
CCJ
11.43%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

FTI

Energy industry group

12.04%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FTI
12.04%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 9.23% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 17.77% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CCJ

Energy industry group

9.23%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
CCJ
9.23%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

FTI

Energy industry group

17.77%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
FTI
17.77%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
MetricCCJFTI
ROE (TTM)5.68%38.30%
ROA (TTM)2.79%10.08%
Net Margin (TTM)11.43%12.04%
Operating Margin (TTM)9.23%17.77%
Gross Margin (TTM)33.83%23.60%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 11.04% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 9.35% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Cameco (CCJ) at 246.15% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than TechnipFMC (FTI) at 20.42%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
MetricCCJFTI
Revenue Growth (YoY)11.04%9.35%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)23.07%14.02%
EPS Growth (YoY)246.15%20.42%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)83.08%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 1.09 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Cameco (CCJ) at 2.55 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

CCJ

Energy industry group

2.55

Max
3.64
CCJ
2.55
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

FTI

Energy industry group

1.09

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
FTI
1.09
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Cameco (CCJ) at 0.14 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while TechnipFMC (FTI) at 0.39 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.14

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
CCJ
0.14
Min
0.00

FTI

Energy industry group

0.39

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
FTI
0.39
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
MetricCCJFTI
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.551.09
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.140.39
Net Debt / EBITDA0.190.12

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 0.35% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 0.32% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

0.35%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
CCJ
0.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FTI

Energy industry group

0.32%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
FTI
0.32%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Cameco (CCJ) at 26.37% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 6.29% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CCJ

Energy industry group

26.37%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
CCJ
26.37%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FTI

Energy industry group

6.29%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
FTI
6.29%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
MetricCCJFTI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.35%0.32%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)26.37%6.29%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 19.97 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 108.03 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for CCJ’s trailing earnings.

CCJ

Energy industry group

108.03

CCJ
108.03
Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

FTI

Energy industry group

19.97

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
FTI
19.97
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 2.32 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 8.93 clears its benchmark range — CCJ looks notably rich on sales.

CCJ

Energy industry group

8.93

CCJ
8.93
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

FTI

Energy industry group

2.32

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FTI
2.32
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Measured against book value, both Cameco (CCJ) at 6.03 and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 7.44 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.

CCJ

Energy industry group

6.03

CCJ
6.03
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

FTI

Energy industry group

7.44

FTI
7.44
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Cameco (CCJ) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cameco (CCJ) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
MetricCCJFTI
P/E Ratio (TTM)108.0319.97
P/S Ratio (TTM)8.932.32
P/B Ratio (MRQ)6.037.44
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)0.63%6.01%