CCJ vs. EQT: Cameco vs. EQT Stock Comparison
How do Cameco (CCJ) and EQT (EQT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cameco (CCJ) and EQT (EQT) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CCJ is classified under Coal & Consumable Fuels while EQT falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
| Profile Item | CCJ | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cameco Corporation | EQT Corporation |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Coal & Consumable Fuels | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 31.05 billion USD | 30.90 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 14, 1996 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CCJ | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -18.97% | -12.42% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 21.14% | 9.89% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 22.20% | 21.61% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CCJ | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 51.10% | 30.02% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 0.70 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -49.04% | -42.56% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.27M | 7.75M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CCJ | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.46 | -0.56 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.64 | -0.80 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Cameco (CCJ) at 5.68% and EQT (EQT) at 10.49% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
CCJ
Energy industry group
5.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- CCJ
- 5.68%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
EQT
Energy industry group
10.49%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- EQT
- 10.49%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
EQT (EQT) at 29.01% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Cameco (CCJ) at 11.43%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CCJ
Energy industry group
11.43%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CCJ
- 11.43%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
EQT
Energy industry group
29.01%
- Max
- 56.92%
- EQT
- 29.01%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cameco (CCJ) at 9.23% and EQT (EQT) at 28.24% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CCJ
Energy industry group
9.23%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- CCJ
- 9.23%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
EQT
Energy industry group
28.24%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- EQT
- 28.24%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CCJ | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 5.68% | 10.49% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.79% | 6.25% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.43% | 29.01% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 9.23% | 28.24% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.83% | 80.40% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EQT (EQT) at 59.96% clears its industry range for revenue growth, far stronger top-line momentum than Cameco (CCJ) at 11.04%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
EPS Growth
Both Cameco (CCJ) at 246.15% and EQT (EQT) at 635.56% grew per-share earnings faster than their entire industry benchmark ranges for EPS growth — a strong showing on both sides, though a depressed base year can exaggerate the percentage, so the level of earnings matters too.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CCJ | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 11.04% | 59.96% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 23.07% | -11.72% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 246.15% | 635.56% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 83.08% | -8.91% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Cameco (CCJ) at 2.55 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while EQT (EQT) at 0.71 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
CCJ
Energy industry group
2.55
- Max
- 3.64
- CCJ
- 2.55
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
EQT
Energy industry group
0.71
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- EQT
- 0.71
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Cameco (CCJ) at 0.14 and EQT (EQT) at 0.19 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.
CCJ
Energy industry group
0.14
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- CCJ
- 0.14
- Min
- 0.00
EQT
Energy industry group
0.19
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- EQT
- 0.19
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CCJ | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.55 | 0.71 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.14 | 0.19 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.19 | 0.81 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cameco (CCJ) at 0.35% and EQT (EQT) at 1.30% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CCJ
Energy industry group
0.35%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- CCJ
- 0.35%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EQT
Energy industry group
1.30%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- EQT
- 1.30%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Cameco (CCJ) at 26.37% and EQT (EQT) at 15.64% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CCJ
Energy industry group
26.37%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- CCJ
- 26.37%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EQT
Energy industry group
15.64%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- EQT
- 15.64%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CCJ | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.35% | 1.30% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 26.37% | 15.64% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
EQT (EQT) at 11.71 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 108.03 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for CCJ’s trailing earnings.
CCJ
Energy industry group
108.03
- CCJ
- 108.03
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
EQT
Energy industry group
11.71
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- EQT
- 11.71
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both look expensive on sales: EQT (EQT) at 3.38 sits in the upper P/S ratio quartile, and Cameco (CCJ) at 8.93 prices even higher, above its industry range.
CCJ
Energy industry group
8.93
- CCJ
- 8.93
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
EQT
Energy industry group
3.38
- Max
- 5.40
- EQT
- 3.38
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
EQT (EQT) at 1.21 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Cameco (CCJ) at 6.03 prices above its benchmark range — CCJ looks rich relative to book.
CCJ
Energy industry group
6.03
- CCJ
- 6.03
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
EQT
Energy industry group
1.21
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- EQT
- 1.21
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CCJ | EQT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 108.03 | 11.71 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 8.93 | 3.38 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.03 | 1.21 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 0.63% | 8.01% |