Seek Returns logo

CCEP vs. UL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CCEP and UL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CCEP is a standard domestic listing, while UL trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolCCEPUL
Company NameCoca-Cola Europacific Partners PLCUnilever PLC
CountryUnited KingdomUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryBeveragesPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization40.82 billion USD146.74 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 24, 1986March 25, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CCEP and UL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CCEP vs. UL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCCEPUL
5-Day Price Return0.66%-1.73%
13-Week Price Return-3.38%-2.54%
26-Week Price Return4.36%-3.23%
52-Week Price Return14.31%-8.94%
Month-to-Date Return-0.43%-0.64%
Year-to-Date Return17.20%-3.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.69M2.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.90M2.11M
3-Month Volatility23.88%15.26%
Beta0.560.18

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CCEP

18.57%

Beverages Industry

Max
45.90%
Q3
22.74%
Median
10.10%
Q1
6.35%
Min
-13.21%

CCEP’s Return on Equity of 18.57% is on par with the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UL

29.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
33.29%
Q3
19.04%
Median
10.69%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-10.45%

In the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, UL’s Return on Equity of 29.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CCEP vs. UL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CCEP

7.35%

Beverages Industry

Max
21.38%
Q3
12.24%
Median
8.43%
Q1
5.97%
Min
0.65%

CCEP’s Net Profit Margin of 7.35% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Beverages industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UL

9.29%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
10.84%
Median
9.29%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-0.14%

UL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CCEP vs. UL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CCEP

11.27%

Beverages Industry

Max
29.32%
Q3
20.15%
Median
13.14%
Q1
10.74%
Min
1.24%

CCEP’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.27% is around the midpoint for the Beverages industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UL

14.58%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.64%
Q3
16.46%
Median
12.80%
Q1
8.01%
Min
2.98%

UL’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.58% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CCEP vs. UL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCCEPUL
Return on Equity (TTM)18.57%29.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.88%7.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.35%9.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.27%14.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.20%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CCEP

0.83

Beverages Industry

Max
3.52
Q3
2.00
Median
1.22
Q1
0.87
Min
0.55

CCEP’s Current Ratio of 0.83 falls into the lower quartile for the Beverages industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UL

0.76

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.73
Median
1.76
Q1
1.16
Min
0.76

UL’s Current Ratio of 0.76 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CCEP vs. UL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CCEP

1.50

Beverages Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.74
Q1
0.37
Min
0.00

CCEP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Beverages industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.50. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

UL

1.80

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.80
Q3
0.78
Median
0.30
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

UL’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Personal Care Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.80. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CCEP vs. UL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CCEP

11.52

Beverages Industry

Max
78.96
Q3
42.68
Median
10.96
Q1
3.86
Min
0.81

CCEP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.52 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Beverages industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UL

22.79

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-3.28

UL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.79 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CCEP vs. UL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCCEPUL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.830.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.650.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.501.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.5222.79

Growth

Revenue Growth

CCEP vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CCEP vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CCEP

2.62%

Beverages Industry

Max
7.92%
Q3
4.37%
Median
3.32%
Q1
1.98%
Min
0.00%

CCEP’s Dividend Yield of 2.62% is consistent with its peers in the Beverages industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UL

3.56%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
2.70%
Median
1.98%
Q1
0.95%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.56%, UL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CCEP vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CCEP

60.89%

Beverages Industry

Max
188.65%
Q3
104.55%
Median
72.60%
Q1
40.31%
Min
0.00%

CCEP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.89% is within the typical range for the Beverages industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UL

79.51%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
221.40%
Q3
137.27%
Median
70.48%
Q1
51.10%
Min
0.00%

UL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.51% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CCEP vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCCEPUL
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.62%3.56%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)60.89%79.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CCEP

23.20

Beverages Industry

Max
35.25
Q3
22.66
Median
17.17
Q1
13.65
Min
4.77

A P/E Ratio of 23.20 places CCEP in the upper quartile for the Beverages industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UL

22.31

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
46.28
Q3
31.71
Median
22.50
Q1
20.20
Min
11.79

UL’s P/E Ratio of 22.31 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CCEP vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CCEP

1.70

Beverages Industry

Max
4.06
Q3
2.24
Median
1.34
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

CCEP’s P/S Ratio of 1.70 aligns with the market consensus for the Beverages industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UL

2.07

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
2.35
Median
1.92
Q1
1.18
Min
0.00

UL’s P/S Ratio of 2.07 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CCEP vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CCEP

4.46

Beverages Industry

Max
6.90
Q3
4.23
Median
2.20
Q1
1.51
Min
0.69

CCEP’s P/B Ratio of 4.46 is in the upper tier for the Beverages industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UL

7.00

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
12.00
Q3
6.22
Median
2.84
Q1
1.70
Min
1.12

UL’s P/B Ratio of 7.00 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CCEP vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Beverages and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCCEPUL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.2022.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.702.07
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.467.00
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)17.9019.25