Seek Returns logo

CBT vs. LYB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CBT and LYB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCBTLYB
Company NameCabot CorporationLyondellBasell Industries N.V.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryChemicalsChemicals
Market Capitalization4.37 billion USD17.02 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 5, 1980April 28, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CBT and LYB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CBT vs. LYB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCBTLYB
5-Day Price Return5.54%5.50%
13-Week Price Return7.80%-12.77%
26-Week Price Return-6.63%-31.92%
52-Week Price Return-13.84%-44.71%
Month-to-Date Return13.67%-8.63%
Year-to-Date Return-10.14%-28.73%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.50M7.00M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.43M4.59M
3-Month Volatility32.98%48.45%
Beta0.920.93

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CBT

29.52%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

CBT’s Return on Equity of 29.52% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Chemicals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

LYB

2.08%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

LYB’s Return on Equity of 2.08% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CBT vs. LYB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CBT

11.14%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.14% places CBT in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LYB

0.75%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, LYB’s Net Profit Margin of 0.75% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CBT vs. LYB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CBT

16.62%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.62% places CBT in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

LYB

1.52%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

LYB’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.52% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CBT vs. LYB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCBTLYB
Return on Equity (TTM)29.52%2.08%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.33%0.73%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.14%0.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.62%1.52%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.16%9.47%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CBT

2.13

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

CBT’s Current Ratio of 2.13 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

LYB

1.77

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

LYB’s Current Ratio of 1.77 aligns with the median group of the Chemicals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CBT vs. LYB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CBT

0.79

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

CBT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LYB

0.99

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

LYB’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Chemicals industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.99. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CBT vs. LYB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CBT

11.80

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

CBT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.80 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LYB

3.85

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

LYB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 3.85 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Chemicals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CBT vs. LYB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCBTLYB
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.131.77
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.250.92
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.790.99
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.803.85

Growth

Revenue Growth

CBT vs. LYB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CBT vs. LYB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CBT

2.25%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

CBT’s Dividend Yield of 2.25% is consistent with its peers in the Chemicals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LYB

10.84%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

LYB’s Dividend Yield of 10.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Chemicals industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

CBT vs. LYB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CBT

22.35%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

CBT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.35% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

LYB

152.02%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

LYB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 152.02% is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CBT vs. LYB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCBTLYB
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.25%10.84%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.35%152.02%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CBT

9.92

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, CBT’s P/E Ratio of 9.92 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LYB

61.71

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

At 61.71, LYB’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CBT vs. LYB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CBT

1.10

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

CBT’s P/S Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the market consensus for the Chemicals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LYB

0.46

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry, LYB’s P/S Ratio of 0.46 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CBT vs. LYB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CBT

2.61

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

CBT’s P/B Ratio of 2.61 is in the upper tier for the Chemicals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

LYB

1.56

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

LYB’s P/B Ratio of 1.56 is within the conventional range for the Chemicals industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CBT vs. LYB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Chemicals industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCBTLYB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)9.9261.71
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.100.46
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.611.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.116.27