Seek Returns logo

CAVA vs. EBAY: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CAVA and EBAY, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCAVAEBAY
Company NameCAVA Group, Inc.eBay Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization8.15 billion USD46.05 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 15, 2023September 24, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CAVA and EBAY by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CAVA vs. EBAY: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCAVAEBAY
5-Day Price Return-20.75%8.33%
13-Week Price Return-28.65%45.71%
26-Week Price Return-50.37%49.29%
52-Week Price Return-21.64%80.56%
Month-to-Date Return-19.95%9.83%
Year-to-Date Return-37.54%62.66%
10-Day Avg. Volume7.91M7.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.14M5.87M
3-Month Volatility56.00%40.74%
Beta1.881.33

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CAVA

21.57%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

CAVA’s Return on Equity of 21.57% is on par with the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EBAY

43.08%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

In the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, EBAY’s Return on Equity of 43.08% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CAVA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CAVA

13.70%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

CAVA’s Net Profit Margin of 13.70% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EBAY

20.86%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

EBAY’s Net Profit Margin of 20.86% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CAVA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CAVA

4.78%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

CAVA’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.78% is in the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EBAY

21.38%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.38% places EBAY in the upper quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CAVA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCAVAEBAY
Return on Equity (TTM)21.57%43.08%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.58%11.47%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.70%20.86%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.78%21.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)32.26%71.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CAVA

3.00

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

CAVA’s Current Ratio of 3.00 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

EBAY

1.00

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

EBAY’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CAVA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CAVA

0.00

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, CAVA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

EBAY

1.42

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

EBAY’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Broadline Retail industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.42. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CAVA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CAVA

-1,252.06

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

CAVA has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1,252.06. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

EBAY

57.95

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 57.95, EBAY demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CAVA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCAVAEBAY
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.001.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.870.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.001.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-1,252.0657.95

Growth

Revenue Growth

CAVA vs. EBAY: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CAVA vs. EBAY: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CAVA

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CAVA currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EBAY

1.17%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EBAY’s Dividend Yield of 1.17% is consistent with its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CAVA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CAVA

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CAVA has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EBAY

24.13%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EBAY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.13% is within the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CAVA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCAVAEBAY
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.17%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%24.13%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CAVA

57.37

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

A P/E Ratio of 57.37 places CAVA in the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EBAY

20.64

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

EBAY’s P/E Ratio of 20.64 is within the middle range for the Broadline Retail industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CAVA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CAVA

7.86

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

With a P/S Ratio of 7.86, CAVA trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

EBAY

4.31

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

EBAY’s P/S Ratio of 4.31 is in the upper echelon for the Broadline Retail industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CAVA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CAVA

12.80

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

CAVA’s P/B Ratio of 12.80 is in the upper tier for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

EBAY

7.23

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

EBAY’s P/B Ratio of 7.23 is in the upper tier for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CAVA vs. EBAY: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCAVAEBAY
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)57.3720.64
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)7.864.31
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)12.807.23
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)160.0921.18