Seek Returns logo

CAT vs. OC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CAT and OC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCATOC
Company NameCaterpillar Inc.Owens Corning
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryBuilding Products
Market Capitalization225.25 billion USD11.97 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962November 1, 2006
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CAT and OC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CAT vs. OC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCATOC
5-Day Price Return3.69%-1.33%
13-Week Price Return23.00%2.87%
26-Week Price Return41.71%-4.22%
52-Week Price Return22.93%-18.84%
Month-to-Date Return0.77%-5.80%
Year-to-Date Return32.54%-16.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.27M1.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.77M0.91M
3-Month Volatility22.16%34.48%
Beta1.551.34

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CAT

49.92%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

CAT’s Return on Equity of 49.92% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

OC

6.42%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

OC’s Return on Equity of 6.42% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CAT vs. OC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CAT

14.95%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.95% places CAT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

OC

2.98%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, OC’s Net Profit Margin of 2.98% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CAT vs. OC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CAT

18.23%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.23% places CAT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

OC

10.56%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

OC’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.56% is around the midpoint for the Building Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CAT vs. OC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCATOC
Return on Equity (TTM)49.92%6.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.81%2.30%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.95%2.98%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.23%10.56%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.53%29.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CAT

1.34

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

CAT’s Current Ratio of 1.34 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

OC

1.52

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

OC’s Current Ratio of 1.52 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CAT vs. OC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CAT

2.18

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.18, CAT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

OC

1.07

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

OC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CAT vs. OC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CAT

12.53

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

CAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

OC

5.32

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, OC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.32 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

CAT vs. OC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCATOC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.341.52
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.720.95
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.181.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.535.32

Growth

Revenue Growth

CAT vs. OC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CAT vs. OC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CAT

1.19%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

CAT’s Dividend Yield of 1.19% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

OC

1.88%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

OC’s Dividend Yield of 1.88% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CAT vs. OC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CAT

28.60%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

CAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.60% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

OC

16.23%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

OC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.23% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CAT vs. OC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCATOC
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.19%1.88%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.60%16.23%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CAT

23.96

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

CAT’s P/E Ratio of 23.96 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

OC

35.40

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

A P/E Ratio of 35.40 places OC in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CAT vs. OC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CAT

3.58

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

CAT’s P/S Ratio of 3.58 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

OC

1.06

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, OC’s P/S Ratio of 1.06 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CAT vs. OC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CAT

9.78

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

At 9.78, CAT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

OC

2.27

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

OC’s P/B Ratio of 2.27 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CAT vs. OC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCATOC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.9635.40
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.581.06
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.782.27
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.2210.11