Seek Returns logo

CAT vs. GFL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CAT and GFL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCATGFL
Company NameCaterpillar Inc.GFL Environmental Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization225.25 billion USD16.67 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962March 3, 2020
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CAT and GFL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CAT vs. GFL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCATGFL
5-Day Price Return3.69%2.07%
13-Week Price Return23.00%-3.14%
26-Week Price Return41.71%-4.46%
52-Week Price Return22.93%22.26%
Month-to-Date Return0.77%-3.99%
Year-to-Date Return32.54%2.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.27M0.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.77M0.44M
3-Month Volatility22.16%22.17%
Beta1.550.48

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CAT

49.92%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

CAT’s Return on Equity of 49.92% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

GFL

48.97%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

GFL’s Return on Equity of 48.97% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CAT vs. GFL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CAT

14.95%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.95% places CAT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GFL

49.85%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

GFL’s Net Profit Margin of 49.85% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CAT vs. GFL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CAT

18.23%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.23% places CAT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

GFL

5.83%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

GFL’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.83% is around the midpoint for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CAT vs. GFL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCATGFL
Return on Equity (TTM)49.92%48.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.81%18.18%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.95%49.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.23%5.83%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.53%20.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CAT

1.34

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

CAT’s Current Ratio of 1.34 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

GFL

0.67

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

GFL’s Current Ratio of 0.67 falls into the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CAT vs. GFL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CAT

2.18

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.18, CAT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

GFL

0.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

GFL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.94 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CAT vs. GFL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CAT

12.53

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

CAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GFL

-0.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

GFL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.09. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CAT vs. GFL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCATGFL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.340.67
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.720.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.180.94
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.53-0.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

CAT vs. GFL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CAT vs. GFL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CAT

1.19%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

CAT’s Dividend Yield of 1.19% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

GFL

0.13%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Yield of 0.13% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CAT vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CAT

28.60%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

CAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.60% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

GFL

0.61%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

GFL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.61% is in the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CAT vs. GFL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCATGFL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.19%0.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.60%0.61%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CAT

23.96

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

CAT’s P/E Ratio of 23.96 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

GFL

6.64

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

In the lower quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, GFL’s P/E Ratio of 6.64 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CAT vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CAT

3.58

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

CAT’s P/S Ratio of 3.58 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GFL

3.31

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

GFL’s P/S Ratio of 3.31 is in the upper echelon for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CAT vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CAT

9.78

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

At 9.78, CAT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

GFL

3.27

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

GFL’s P/B Ratio of 3.27 is within the conventional range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CAT vs. GFL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCATGFL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.966.64
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.583.31
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.783.27
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.2272.36