Seek Returns logo

CAT vs. CTAS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CAT and CTAS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCATCTAS
Company NameCaterpillar Inc.Cintas Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization232.08 billion USD80.20 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962August 19, 1983
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CAT and CTAS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CAT vs. CTAS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCATCTAS
5-Day Price Return3.82%-3.03%
13-Week Price Return26.53%-8.50%
26-Week Price Return49.86%-4.25%
52-Week Price Return26.67%-2.69%
Month-to-Date Return3.82%-3.03%
Year-to-Date Return36.56%8.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.84M2.00M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.79M1.69M
3-Month Volatility22.34%16.81%
Beta1.550.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CAT

49.92%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

CAT’s Return on Equity of 49.92% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CTAS

41.21%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

CTAS’s Return on Equity of 41.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CAT vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CAT

14.95%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.95% places CAT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CTAS

17.53%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

CTAS’s Net Profit Margin of 17.53% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

CAT vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CAT

18.23%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.23% places CAT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CTAS

22.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.82% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CAT vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCATCTAS
Return on Equity (TTM)49.92%41.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.81%19.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.95%17.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.23%22.82%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)36.53%50.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CAT

1.34

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

CAT’s Current Ratio of 1.34 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CTAS

2.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

CTAS’s Current Ratio of 2.09 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CAT vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CAT

2.18

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.18, CAT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CTAS

0.52

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CAT vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CAT

12.53

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

CAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CTAS

24.70

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

CTAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 24.70 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CAT vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCATCTAS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.342.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.721.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.180.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.5324.70

Growth

Revenue Growth

CAT vs. CTAS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CAT vs. CTAS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CAT

1.16%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

CAT’s Dividend Yield of 1.16% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CTAS

0.76%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.76% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CAT vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CAT

28.60%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

CAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.60% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CTAS

33.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.75% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CAT vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCATCTAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.16%0.76%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.60%33.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CAT

24.61

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

CAT’s P/E Ratio of 24.61 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CTAS

44.55

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

A P/E Ratio of 44.55 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CAT vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CAT

3.68

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

CAT’s P/S Ratio of 3.68 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CTAS

7.81

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

With a P/S Ratio of 7.81, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CAT vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CAT

9.78

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

At 9.78, CAT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CTAS

19.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

At 19.50, CTAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CAT vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCATCTAS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.6144.55
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.687.81
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.7819.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)30.0145.95