Seek Returns logo

CARR vs. VRT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CARR and VRT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCARRVRT
Company NameCarrier Global CorporationVertiv Holdings Co
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsElectrical Equipment
Market Capitalization57.06 billion USD52.47 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 19, 2020August 2, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CARR and VRT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CARR vs. VRT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCARRVRT
5-Day Price Return1.04%-1.43%
13-Week Price Return-8.70%35.97%
26-Week Price Return2.82%14.92%
52-Week Price Return4.29%88.37%
Month-to-Date Return-2.29%-5.63%
Year-to-Date Return-1.77%20.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.44M6.72M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.06M8.39M
3-Month Volatility31.67%42.29%
Beta1.291.86

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CARR

27.91%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CARR’s Return on Equity of 27.91% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VRT

32.36%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 32.36% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CARR vs. VRT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CARR

17.81%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.81% places CARR in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRT

8.93%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

VRT’s Net Profit Margin of 8.93% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CARR vs. VRT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CARR

13.66%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

CARR’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.66% is around the midpoint for the Building Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VRT

13.20%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

VRT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.20% is around the midpoint for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CARR vs. VRT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCARRVRT
Return on Equity (TTM)27.91%32.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.49%8.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.81%8.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.66%13.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.89%35.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CARR

1.17

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

CARR’s Current Ratio of 1.17 falls into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

VRT

1.74

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CARR vs. VRT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CARR

0.78

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

CARR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VRT

0.93

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

VRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CARR vs. VRT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CARR

11.06

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

CARR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRT

2.36

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CARR vs. VRT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCARRVRT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.171.74
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.801.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.780.93
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.062.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

CARR vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CARR vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CARR

1.28%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

CARR’s Dividend Yield of 1.28% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRT

0.10%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CARR vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CARR

18.25%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

CARR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.25% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRT

6.39%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.39% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CARR vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCARRVRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.28%0.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.25%6.39%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CARR

14.23

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, CARR’s P/E Ratio of 14.23 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VRT

66.31

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

A P/E Ratio of 66.31 places VRT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CARR vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CARR

2.54

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

CARR’s P/S Ratio of 2.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VRT

5.92

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

VRT’s P/S Ratio of 5.92 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CARR vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CARR

4.27

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

CARR’s P/B Ratio of 4.27 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRT

15.66

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

At 15.66, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CARR vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCARRVRT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.2366.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.545.92
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.2715.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)47.9743.36