Seek Returns logo

CARR vs. STN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CARR and STN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCARRSTN
Company NameCarrier Global CorporationStantec Inc.
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization50.60 billion USD12.43 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 19, 2020August 5, 2005
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CARR and STN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CARR vs. STN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCARRSTN
5-Day Price Return1.21%0.75%
13-Week Price Return-19.97%-0.08%
26-Week Price Return-9.46%25.47%
52-Week Price Return-26.13%38.00%
Month-to-Date Return-0.40%0.54%
Year-to-Date Return-12.89%33.08%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.94M0.45M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.03M0.29M
3-Month Volatility32.97%19.69%
Beta1.310.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CARR

27.91%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CARR’s Return on Equity of 27.91% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

STN

15.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

STN’s Return on Equity of 15.34% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CARR vs. STN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CARR

17.81%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.81% places CARR in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

STN

7.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.10% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CARR vs. STN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CARR

13.66%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

CARR’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.66% is around the midpoint for the Building Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

STN

9.22%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

STN’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.22% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CARR vs. STN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCARRSTN
Return on Equity (TTM)27.91%15.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.49%6.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.81%7.10%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.66%9.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.89%54.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CARR

1.17

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

CARR’s Current Ratio of 1.17 falls into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

STN

1.29

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

STN’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CARR vs. STN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CARR

0.78

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

CARR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

STN

0.69

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

STN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CARR vs. STN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CARR

11.06

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

CARR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

STN

60.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 60.60, STN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

CARR vs. STN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCARRSTN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.171.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.801.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.780.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.0660.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

CARR vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CARR vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CARR

1.44%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

CARR’s Dividend Yield of 1.44% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

STN

0.57%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Yield of 0.57% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CARR vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CARR

18.25%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

CARR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.25% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

STN

22.30%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

STN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.30% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CARR vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCARRSTN
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.44%0.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.25%22.30%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CARR

12.69

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, CARR’s P/E Ratio of 12.69 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

STN

39.20

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

A P/E Ratio of 39.20 places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CARR vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CARR

2.26

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

CARR’s P/S Ratio of 2.26 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

STN

2.78

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

STN’s P/S Ratio of 2.78 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CARR vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CARR

4.27

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

CARR’s P/B Ratio of 4.27 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

STN

4.38

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

STN’s P/B Ratio of 4.38 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

CARR vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCARRSTN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)12.6939.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.262.78
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.274.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)42.7727.29