Seek Returns logo

CARR vs. SNA: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CARR and SNA, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCARRSNA
Company NameCarrier Global CorporationSnap-on Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsMachinery
Market Capitalization57.06 billion USD17.41 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 19, 2020February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CARR and SNA by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CARR vs. SNA: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCARRSNA
5-Day Price Return1.04%4.00%
13-Week Price Return-8.70%2.09%
26-Week Price Return2.82%-1.77%
52-Week Price Return4.29%24.64%
Month-to-Date Return-2.29%3.93%
Year-to-Date Return-1.77%-1.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.44M0.25M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.06M0.37M
3-Month Volatility31.67%23.78%
Beta1.290.79

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CARR

27.91%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CARR’s Return on Equity of 27.91% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SNA

18.10%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

SNA’s Return on Equity of 18.10% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CARR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CARR

17.81%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.81% places CARR in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

SNA

19.72%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.72% places SNA in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CARR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CARR

13.66%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

CARR’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.66% is around the midpoint for the Building Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SNA

25.57%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.57% places SNA in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CARR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCARRSNA
Return on Equity (TTM)27.91%18.10%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.49%12.45%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.81%19.72%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.66%25.57%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.89%51.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CARR

1.17

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

CARR’s Current Ratio of 1.17 falls into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SNA

4.48

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

SNA’s Current Ratio of 4.48 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Machinery industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

CARR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CARR

0.78

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

CARR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SNA

0.21

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SNA’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

CARR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CARR

11.06

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

CARR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SNA

65.15

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

SNA’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 65.15 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CARR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCARRSNA
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.174.48
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.803.23
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.780.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.0665.15

Growth

Revenue Growth

CARR vs. SNA: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CARR vs. SNA: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CARR

1.28%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

CARR’s Dividend Yield of 1.28% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SNA

2.55%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

SNA’s Dividend Yield of 2.55% is consistent with its peers in the Machinery industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CARR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CARR

18.25%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

CARR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.25% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SNA

43.42%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

SNA’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 43.42% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CARR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCARRSNA
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.28%2.55%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.25%43.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CARR

14.23

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, CARR’s P/E Ratio of 14.23 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SNA

17.06

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

SNA’s P/E Ratio of 17.06 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CARR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CARR

2.54

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

CARR’s P/S Ratio of 2.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SNA

3.36

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

SNA’s P/S Ratio of 3.36 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CARR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CARR

4.27

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

CARR’s P/B Ratio of 4.27 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SNA

2.85

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

SNA’s P/B Ratio of 2.85 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CARR vs. SNA: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCARRSNA
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.2317.06
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.543.36
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.272.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)47.9716.69