Seek Returns logo

CARR vs. LMT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CARR and LMT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCARRLMT
Company NameCarrier Global CorporationLockheed Martin Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsAerospace & Defense
Market Capitalization57.06 billion USD103.32 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 19, 2020January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CARR and LMT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CARR vs. LMT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCARRLMT
5-Day Price Return1.04%2.74%
13-Week Price Return-8.70%-6.47%
26-Week Price Return2.82%-1.33%
52-Week Price Return4.29%-20.53%
Month-to-Date Return-2.29%5.13%
Year-to-Date Return-1.77%-8.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.44M1.72M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.06M1.71M
3-Month Volatility31.67%32.09%
Beta1.290.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CARR

27.91%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CARR’s Return on Equity of 27.91% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

LMT

65.82%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
43.89%
Q3
22.42%
Median
12.50%
Q1
5.21%
Min
-6.24%

LMT’s Return on Equity of 65.82% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CARR vs. LMT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CARR

17.81%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.81% places CARR in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

LMT

5.85%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
14.54%
Q3
8.08%
Median
6.17%
Q1
2.49%
Min
-1.63%

LMT’s Net Profit Margin of 5.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CARR vs. LMT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CARR

13.66%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

CARR’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.66% is around the midpoint for the Building Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LMT

8.29%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
16.63%
Q3
10.38%
Median
8.29%
Q1
6.21%
Min
0.95%

LMT’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.29% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CARR vs. LMT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCARRLMT
Return on Equity (TTM)27.91%65.82%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.49%7.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.81%5.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.66%8.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)27.89%8.25%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CARR

1.17

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

CARR’s Current Ratio of 1.17 falls into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

LMT

0.99

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
3.09
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
1.03
Min
0.02

LMT’s Current Ratio of 0.99 falls into the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CARR vs. LMT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CARR

0.78

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

CARR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

LMT

4.06

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
1.70
Q3
1.04
Median
0.68
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 4.06, LMT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Aerospace & Defense industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CARR vs. LMT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CARR

11.06

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

CARR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.06 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

LMT

7.49

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
36.57
Q3
19.90
Median
7.04
Q1
2.40
Min
-7.63

LMT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.49 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CARR vs. LMT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCARRLMT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.170.99
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.800.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.784.06
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.067.49

Growth

Revenue Growth

CARR vs. LMT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CARR vs. LMT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CARR

1.28%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

CARR’s Dividend Yield of 1.28% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

LMT

3.03%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
2.03%
Q3
1.22%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Yield of 3.03% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

CARR vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CARR

18.25%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

CARR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 18.25% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

LMT

73.60%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
83.87%
Q3
49.90%
Median
16.48%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

LMT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 73.60% is in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CARR vs. LMT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCARRLMT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.28%3.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)18.25%73.60%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CARR

14.23

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, CARR’s P/E Ratio of 14.23 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

LMT

24.29

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
65.97
Q3
54.11
Median
34.53
Q1
23.66
Min
0.00

LMT’s P/E Ratio of 24.29 is within the middle range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CARR vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CARR

2.54

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

CARR’s P/S Ratio of 2.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

LMT

1.42

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
8.07
Q3
4.49
Median
2.42
Q1
1.39
Min
0.00

LMT’s P/S Ratio of 1.42 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CARR vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CARR

4.27

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

CARR’s P/B Ratio of 4.27 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LMT

20.34

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max
13.67
Q3
7.92
Median
4.65
Q1
2.68
Min
0.82

At 20.34, LMT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Aerospace & Defense industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CARR vs. LMT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Aerospace & Defense industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCARRLMT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.2324.29
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.541.42
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.2720.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)47.9720.49