Seek Returns logo

CAG vs. K: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CAG and K, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCAGK
Company NameConagra Brands, Inc.Kellanova
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFood ProductsFood Products
Market Capitalization9.14 billion USD28.67 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CAG and K by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CAG vs. K: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCAGK
5-Day Price Return5.93%6.57%
13-Week Price Return-8.96%3.13%
26-Week Price Return-28.35%-0.52%
52-Week Price Return-36.47%1.53%
Month-to-Date Return4.37%3.17%
Year-to-Date Return-31.14%1.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume13.11M4.37M
3-Month Avg. Volume10.89M3.27M
3-Month Volatility26.97%11.94%
Beta-0.010.23

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CAG

13.09%

Food Products Industry

Max
30.51%
Q3
16.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-2.18%

CAG’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

K

34.57%

Food Products Industry

Max
30.51%
Q3
16.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-2.18%

K’s Return on Equity of 34.57% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Food Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CAG vs. K: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CAG

9.92%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
10.21%
Median
6.29%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-0.80%

CAG’s Net Profit Margin of 9.92% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Food Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

K

10.56%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
10.21%
Median
6.29%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-0.80%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.56% places K in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CAG vs. K: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CAG

12.23%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.29%
Median
9.64%
Q1
6.11%
Min
0.08%

CAG’s Operating Profit Margin of 12.23% is around the midpoint for the Food Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

K

14.67%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.29%
Median
9.64%
Q1
6.11%
Min
0.08%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.67% places K in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CAG vs. K: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCAGK
Return on Equity (TTM)13.09%34.57%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.49%8.51%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.92%10.56%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)12.23%14.67%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.95%35.99%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CAG

0.71

Food Products Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
2.39
Median
1.62
Q1
1.23
Min
0.57

CAG’s Current Ratio of 0.71 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

K

0.68

Food Products Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
2.39
Median
1.62
Q1
1.23
Min
0.57

K’s Current Ratio of 0.68 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CAG vs. K: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CAG

0.90

Food Products Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.92
Median
0.51
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

CAG’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.90 is typical for the Food Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

K

1.43

Food Products Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.92
Median
0.51
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

K’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.43. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CAG vs. K: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CAG

5.89

Food Products Industry

Max
65.06
Q3
29.45
Median
9.43
Q1
4.70
Min
-1.69

CAG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.89 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

K

49.65

Food Products Industry

Max
65.06
Q3
29.45
Median
9.43
Q1
4.70
Min
-1.69

K’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 49.65 is in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

CAG vs. K: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCAGK
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.710.68
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.220.45
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.901.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.8949.65

Growth

Revenue Growth

CAG vs. K: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CAG vs. K: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CAG

7.31%

Food Products Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
4.48%
Median
2.69%
Q1
1.66%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 7.31%, CAG offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Food Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

K

2.75%

Food Products Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
4.48%
Median
2.69%
Q1
1.66%
Min
0.00%

K’s Dividend Yield of 2.75% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CAG vs. K: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CAG

58.07%

Food Products Industry

Max
216.00%
Q3
112.15%
Median
72.83%
Q1
41.56%
Min
0.00%

CAG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 58.07% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

K

59.03%

Food Products Industry

Max
216.00%
Q3
112.15%
Median
72.83%
Q1
41.56%
Min
0.00%

K’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.03% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CAG vs. K: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCAGK
Dividend Yield (TTM)7.31%2.75%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)58.07%59.03%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CAG

7.94

Food Products Industry

Max
41.70
Q3
24.61
Median
17.81
Q1
12.59
Min
3.07

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, CAG’s P/E Ratio of 7.94 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

K

21.43

Food Products Industry

Max
41.70
Q3
24.61
Median
17.81
Q1
12.59
Min
3.07

K’s P/E Ratio of 21.43 is within the middle range for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CAG vs. K: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CAG

0.79

Food Products Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
1.74
Median
1.10
Q1
0.66
Min
0.11

CAG’s P/S Ratio of 0.79 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

K

2.26

Food Products Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
1.74
Median
1.10
Q1
0.66
Min
0.11

K’s P/S Ratio of 2.26 is in the upper echelon for the Food Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CAG vs. K: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CAG

1.20

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.98
Median
1.93
Q1
1.28
Min
0.47

CAG’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

K

6.72

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.98
Median
1.93
Q1
1.28
Min
0.47

At 6.72, K’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Food Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CAG vs. K: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCAGK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)7.9421.43
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.792.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.206.72
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)7.0240.29