Seek Returns logo

CAG vs. GIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CAG and GIS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCAGGIS
Company NameConagra Brands, Inc.General Mills, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryFood ProductsFood Products
Market Capitalization8.95 billion USD26.54 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CAG and GIS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CAG vs. GIS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCAGGIS
5-Day Price Return-2.45%-1.13%
13-Week Price Return-8.19%-2.83%
26-Week Price Return-30.13%-18.40%
52-Week Price Return-35.70%-31.61%
Month-to-Date Return2.18%-1.33%
Year-to-Date Return-32.58%-21.99%
10-Day Avg. Volume13.29M5.12M
3-Month Avg. Volume11.02M5.90M
3-Month Volatility26.74%19.29%
Beta-0.01-0.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CAG

9.60%

Food Products Industry

Max
30.51%
Q3
16.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-2.18%

CAG’s Return on Equity of 9.60% is on par with the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GIS

31.42%

Food Products Industry

Max
30.51%
Q3
16.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-2.18%

GIS’s Return on Equity of 31.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Food Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CAG vs. GIS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CAG

7.42%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
10.21%
Median
6.29%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-0.80%

CAG’s Net Profit Margin of 7.42% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Food Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

GIS

15.24%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
10.21%
Median
6.29%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-0.80%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.24% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CAG vs. GIS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CAG

11.88%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.29%
Median
9.64%
Q1
6.11%
Min
0.08%

CAG’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.88% is around the midpoint for the Food Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GIS

21.92%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.29%
Median
9.64%
Q1
6.11%
Min
0.08%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.92% places GIS in the upper quartile for the Food Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CAG vs. GIS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCAGGIS
Return on Equity (TTM)9.60%31.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.05%8.83%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.42%15.24%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)11.88%21.92%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.43%34.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CAG

1.06

Food Products Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
2.39
Median
1.62
Q1
1.23
Min
0.57

CAG’s Current Ratio of 1.06 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GIS

0.66

Food Products Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
2.39
Median
1.62
Q1
1.23
Min
0.57

GIS’s Current Ratio of 0.66 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CAG vs. GIS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CAG

0.93

Food Products Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.92
Median
0.51
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

CAG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.93. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

GIS

1.52

Food Products Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.92
Median
0.51
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

GIS’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.52. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CAG vs. GIS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CAG

5.89

Food Products Industry

Max
65.06
Q3
29.45
Median
9.43
Q1
4.70
Min
-1.69

CAG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.89 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GIS

6.41

Food Products Industry

Max
65.06
Q3
29.45
Median
9.43
Q1
4.70
Min
-1.69

GIS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.41 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Food Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CAG vs. GIS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCAGGIS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.060.66
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.400.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.931.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.896.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

CAG vs. GIS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CAG vs. GIS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CAG

7.47%

Food Products Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
4.48%
Median
2.69%
Q1
1.66%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 7.47%, CAG offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Food Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

GIS

4.99%

Food Products Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
4.48%
Median
2.69%
Q1
1.66%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.99%, GIS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Food Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

CAG vs. GIS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CAG

78.70%

Food Products Industry

Max
216.00%
Q3
112.15%
Median
72.83%
Q1
41.56%
Min
0.00%

CAG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 78.70% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

GIS

45.62%

Food Products Industry

Max
216.00%
Q3
112.15%
Median
72.83%
Q1
41.56%
Min
0.00%

GIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 45.62% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CAG vs. GIS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCAGGIS
Dividend Yield (TTM)7.47%4.99%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)78.70%45.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CAG

10.53

Food Products Industry

Max
41.70
Q3
24.61
Median
17.81
Q1
12.59
Min
3.07

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, CAG’s P/E Ratio of 10.53 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

GIS

9.13

Food Products Industry

Max
41.70
Q3
24.61
Median
17.81
Q1
12.59
Min
3.07

In the lower quartile for the Food Products industry, GIS’s P/E Ratio of 9.13 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

CAG vs. GIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CAG

0.78

Food Products Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
1.74
Median
1.10
Q1
0.66
Min
0.11

CAG’s P/S Ratio of 0.78 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

GIS

1.39

Food Products Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
1.74
Median
1.10
Q1
0.66
Min
0.11

GIS’s P/S Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CAG vs. GIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CAG

1.03

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.98
Median
1.93
Q1
1.28
Min
0.47

CAG’s P/B Ratio of 1.03 is in the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

GIS

2.77

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.98
Median
1.93
Q1
1.28
Min
0.47

GIS’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is within the conventional range for the Food Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CAG vs. GIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Food Products industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCAGGIS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.539.13
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.781.39
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.032.77
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.8712.72