Seek Returns logo

CACI vs. JBL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CACI and JBL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCACIJBL
Company NameCACI International IncJabil Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsInformation Technology
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesElectronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
Market Capitalization11.33 billion USD23.16 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980May 3, 1993
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CACI and JBL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CACI vs. JBL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCACIJBL
5-Day Price Return0.31%2.21%
13-Week Price Return4.63%-0.60%
26-Week Price Return33.73%54.12%
52-Week Price Return-0.24%79.29%
Month-to-Date Return3.97%-1.07%
Year-to-Date Return23.44%49.30%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.26M2.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.26M1.53M
3-Month Volatility28.48%33.42%
Beta0.621.26

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CACI

13.35%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

CACI’s Return on Equity of 13.35% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

JBL

45.71%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

JBL’s Return on Equity of 45.71% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

CACI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CACI

5.79%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

CACI’s Net Profit Margin of 5.79% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

JBL

2.20%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.20% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CACI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CACI

8.86%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

CACI’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.86% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

JBL

3.97%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

JBL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.97% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CACI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCACIJBL
Return on Equity (TTM)13.35%45.71%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.07%3.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.79%2.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.86%3.97%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)32.36%8.88%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CACI

1.47

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

CACI’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JBL

1.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

JBL’s Current Ratio of 1.00 falls into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CACI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CACI

0.75

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

CACI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.75 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JBL

1.91

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.91, JBL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

CACI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CACI

4.81

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, CACI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.81 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

JBL

4.08

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

JBL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CACI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCACIJBL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.471.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.260.51
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.751.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.814.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

CACI vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CACI vs. JBL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CACI

0.00%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

CACI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

JBL

0.16%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Yield of 0.16% is in the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CACI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CACI

0.00%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

CACI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

JBL

5.48%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

JBL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.48% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CACI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCACIJBL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.16%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%5.48%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CACI

21.68

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

CACI’s P/E Ratio of 21.68 is within the middle range for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

JBL

35.24

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

JBL’s P/E Ratio of 35.24 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CACI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CACI

1.26

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

CACI’s P/S Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JBL

0.78

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

In the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, JBL’s P/S Ratio of 0.78 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CACI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CACI

2.69

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

CACI’s P/B Ratio of 2.69 is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

JBL

14.53

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

At 14.53, JBL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CACI vs. JBL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCACIJBL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.6835.24
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.260.78
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.6914.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.5119.76