Seek Returns logo

CACI vs. FIS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CACI and FIS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCACIFIS
Company NameCACI International IncFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsFinancials
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesFinancial Services
Market Capitalization11.33 billion USD34.74 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980June 20, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CACI and FIS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CACI vs. FIS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCACIFIS
5-Day Price Return0.31%2.82%
13-Week Price Return4.63%-19.00%
26-Week Price Return33.73%-11.58%
52-Week Price Return-0.24%-20.68%
Month-to-Date Return3.97%-5.54%
Year-to-Date Return23.44%-18.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.26M4.82M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.26M3.51M
3-Month Volatility28.48%27.11%
Beta0.621.04

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CACI

13.35%

Professional Services Industry

Max
68.01%
Q3
35.32%
Median
21.92%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-20.25%

CACI’s Return on Equity of 13.35% is on par with the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FIS

0.73%

Financial Services Industry

Max
39.28%
Q3
18.88%
Median
9.97%
Q1
4.03%
Min
-10.25%

FIS’s Return on Equity of 0.73% is in the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

CACI vs. FIS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CACI

5.79%

Professional Services Industry

Max
31.75%
Q3
15.50%
Median
8.95%
Q1
4.51%
Min
0.35%

CACI’s Net Profit Margin of 5.79% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FIS

1.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.16%
Q3
25.35%
Median
12.68%
Q1
6.11%
Min
-11.69%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, FIS’s Net Profit Margin of 1.09% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CACI vs. FIS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CACI

8.86%

Professional Services Industry

Max
30.62%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.60%
Q1
8.60%
Min
-2.18%

CACI’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.86% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

FIS

17.58%

Financial Services Industry

Max
75.57%
Q3
37.78%
Median
19.09%
Q1
10.04%
Min
-19.42%

FIS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.58% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CACI vs. FIS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCACIFIS
Return on Equity (TTM)13.35%0.73%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.07%0.33%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.79%1.09%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)8.86%17.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)32.36%36.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CACI

1.47

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.28
Q3
1.75
Median
1.34
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

CACI’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FIS

0.59

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.83
Q3
2.70
Median
1.44
Q1
0.86
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CACI vs. FIS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CACI

0.75

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.45
Median
0.98
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

CACI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.75 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FIS

0.91

Financial Services Industry

Max
5.07
Q3
2.14
Median
0.66
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CACI vs. FIS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CACI

4.81

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.45
Q3
20.41
Median
11.64
Q1
5.46
Min
-1.21

In the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry, CACI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.81 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

FIS

6.19

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CACI vs. FIS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCACIFIS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.470.59
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.260.48
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.750.91
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.816.19

Growth

Revenue Growth

CACI vs. FIS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CACI vs. FIS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CACI

0.00%

Professional Services Industry

Max
4.83%
Q3
2.44%
Median
1.52%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

CACI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FIS

2.38%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.12%
Q3
3.37%
Median
1.70%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Yield of 2.38% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CACI vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CACI

0.00%

Professional Services Industry

Max
128.51%
Q3
69.03%
Median
47.00%
Q1
18.05%
Min
0.00%

CACI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FIS

101.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
132.10%
Q3
64.32%
Median
18.23%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FIS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 101.00% is in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

CACI vs. FIS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCACIFIS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.38%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%101.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CACI

21.68

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.60
Q3
33.83
Median
24.95
Q1
17.59
Min
7.96

CACI’s P/E Ratio of 21.68 is within the middle range for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FIS

308.53

Financial Services Industry

Max
45.81
Q3
30.21
Median
16.29
Q1
10.14
Min
0.70

At 308.53, FIS’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Financial Services industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CACI vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CACI

1.26

Professional Services Industry

Max
8.27
Q3
4.40
Median
2.09
Q1
0.99
Min
0.17

CACI’s P/S Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FIS

3.35

Financial Services Industry

Max
10.88
Q3
5.34
Median
2.64
Q1
1.24
Min
0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CACI vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CACI

2.69

Professional Services Industry

Max
18.75
Q3
9.53
Median
5.88
Q1
2.95
Min
0.59

CACI’s P/B Ratio of 2.69 is in the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FIS

3.02

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.93
Q3
3.78
Median
1.49
Q1
0.88
Min
0.08

FIS’s P/B Ratio of 3.02 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CACI vs. FIS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCACIFIS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.68308.53
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.263.35
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.693.02
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)22.5118.90