BXP vs. PSA: BXP vs. Public Storage Stock Comparison

Company Profile

BXP (BXP) and Public Storage (PSA) both fall under the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group, but BXP is classified in Office REITs while PSA is classified in Specialized REITs.

Both BXP (BXP) and Public Storage (PSA) are REITs — read their payout ratios and P/E alongside FFO (funds from operations) rather than at face value.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Public Storage (PSA) at 15.60% sits in the top ROE quartile, while BXP (BXP) at 8.96% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PSA.

Neither BXP (BXP) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Public Storage (PSA) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) is well served by net margin: heavy depreciation makes net income a poor profitability proxy in their businesses, where FFO-based measures are the standard read.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for BXP (BXP) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Public Storage (PSA) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both BXP (BXP) at 2.19% and Public Storage (PSA) at 2.74% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

EPS growth isn't a meaningful figure for either BXP (BXP) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Public Storage (PSA) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) under our convention.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

BXP (BXP) at 0.70 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Public Storage (PSA) at 0.37 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PSA.

Public Storage (PSA) at 0.80 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while BXP (BXP) at 2.22 uses more debt funding than most peers.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both BXP (BXP) at 4.29% and Public Storage (PSA) at 3.52% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

An earnings-based payout ratio fits neither BXP (BXP) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Public Storage (PSA) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): their distributions are mandated and conventionally measured against FFO, so the accounting-earnings ratio overstates both.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

P/E ratio is not a meaningful valuation yardstick for either BXP (BXP) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Public Storage (PSA) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): depreciation suppresses reported earnings in their businesses, and price-to-FFO is the conventional yardstick instead.

BXP (BXP) at 3.38 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Public Storage (PSA) at 12.50 sits in the pricier quartile — PSA costs more per dollar of sales.

BXP (BXP) at 2.00 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Public Storage (PSA) at 6.45 prices above its benchmark range — PSA looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics