Seek Returns logo

BTI vs. UL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BTI and UL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both BTI and UL are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolBTIUL
Company NameBritish American Tobacco p.l.c.Unilever PLC
CountryUnited KingdomUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryTobaccoPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization125.20 billion USD153.29 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 14, 1980March 25, 1980
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BTI and UL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BTI vs. UL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBTIUL
5-Day Price Return-0.07%-1.47%
13-Week Price Return27.54%-1.24%
26-Week Price Return39.70%5.55%
52-Week Price Return50.75%-5.88%
Month-to-Date Return4.78%4.88%
Year-to-Date Return46.98%1.65%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.20M2.58M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.71M2.39M
3-Month Volatility20.41%15.30%
Beta0.340.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BTI

6.40%

Tobacco Industry

Max
49.48%
Q3
49.48%
Median
7.92%
Q1
5.28%
Min
4.04%

BTI’s Return on Equity of 6.40% is on par with the norm for the Tobacco industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UL

29.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

In the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, UL’s Return on Equity of 29.40% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BTI vs. UL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BTI

12.06%

Tobacco Industry

Max
21.36%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.05%
Q1
6.80%
Min
5.37%

BTI’s Net Profit Margin of 12.06% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Tobacco industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UL

9.29%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

UL’s Net Profit Margin of 9.29% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BTI vs. UL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BTI

13.86%

Tobacco Industry

Max
14.35%
Q3
12.68%
Median
11.00%
Q1
10.58%
Min
10.58%

An Operating Profit Margin of 13.86% places BTI in the upper quartile for the Tobacco industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UL

14.58%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

UL’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.58% is around the midpoint for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BTI vs. UL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBTIUL
Return on Equity (TTM)6.40%29.40%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.70%7.13%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.06%9.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.86%14.58%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)83.38%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BTI

0.87

Tobacco Industry

Max
3.20
Q3
1.83
Median
0.83
Q1
0.72
Min
0.57

BTI’s Current Ratio of 0.87 aligns with the median group of the Tobacco industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UL

0.76

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

UL’s Current Ratio of 0.76 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BTI vs. UL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BTI

0.75

Tobacco Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
2.19
Median
0.74
Q1
0.26
Min
0.01

BTI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.75 is typical for the Tobacco industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UL

1.80

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.80, UL operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Personal Care Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

BTI vs. UL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BTI

-11.45

Tobacco Industry

Max
36.48
Q3
28.54
Median
7.02
Q1
6.32
Min
-11.45

BTI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -11.45. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

UL

22.79

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

UL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 22.79 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BTI vs. UL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBTIUL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.870.76
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.550.55
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.751.80
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-11.4522.79

Growth

Revenue Growth

BTI vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BTI vs. UL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BTI

5.64%

Tobacco Industry

Max
6.71%
Q3
6.06%
Median
5.48%
Q1
3.91%
Min
3.27%

BTI’s Dividend Yield of 5.64% is consistent with its peers in the Tobacco industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UL

3.42%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.42%, UL offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Personal Care Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BTI vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BTI

57.82%

Tobacco Industry

Max
77.64%
Q3
76.55%
Median
50.14%
Q1
47.08%
Min
42.39%

BTI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 57.82% is within the typical range for the Tobacco industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UL

79.51%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

UL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 79.51% is within the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BTI vs. UL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBTIUL
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.64%3.42%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)57.82%79.51%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BTI

29.96

Tobacco Industry

Max
42.16
Q3
36.45
Median
20.93
Q1
10.52
Min
9.15

BTI’s P/E Ratio of 29.96 is within the middle range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UL

23.23

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

UL’s P/E Ratio of 23.23 is within the middle range for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BTI vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BTI

3.61

Tobacco Industry

Max
10.48
Q3
5.39
Median
3.32
Q1
1.54
Min
0.59

BTI’s P/S Ratio of 3.61 aligns with the market consensus for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UL

2.16

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

UL’s P/S Ratio of 2.16 aligns with the market consensus for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BTI vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BTI

1.62

Tobacco Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
4.76
Median
2.18
Q1
1.70
Min
1.06

BTI’s P/B Ratio of 1.62 is in the lower quartile for the Tobacco industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

UL

7.06

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

UL’s P/B Ratio of 7.06 is in the upper tier for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BTI vs. UL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBTIUL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.9623.23
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.612.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.627.06
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.6820.05