Seek Returns logo

BTI vs. SJM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BTI and SJM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BTI trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, SJM is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBTISJM
Company NameBritish American Tobacco p.l.c.The J. M. Smucker Company
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryTobaccoFood Products
Market Capitalization112.05 billion USD11.55 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 14, 1980October 31, 1994
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BTI and SJM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BTI vs. SJM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBTISJM
5-Day Price Return-2.11%0.78%
13-Week Price Return9.26%4.05%
26-Week Price Return23.46%-8.54%
52-Week Price Return43.86%-9.09%
Month-to-Date Return-2.28%-0.28%
Year-to-Date Return33.92%-1.65%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.63M2.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.89M2.26M
3-Month Volatility20.00%26.03%
Beta0.450.21

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BTI

6.40%

Tobacco Industry

Max
49.48%
Q3
49.48%
Median
13.16%
Q1
5.02%
Min
4.04%

BTI’s Return on Equity of 6.40% is on par with the norm for the Tobacco industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SJM

-21.99%

Food Products Industry

Max
30.51%
Q3
16.54%
Median
10.46%
Q1
6.76%
Min
-2.18%

SJM has a negative Return on Equity of -21.99%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

BTI vs. SJM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BTI

12.06%

Tobacco Industry

Max
21.36%
Q3
16.88%
Median
10.39%
Q1
7.51%
Min
4.74%

BTI’s Net Profit Margin of 12.06% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Tobacco industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SJM

-16.75%

Food Products Industry

Max
18.44%
Q3
10.21%
Median
6.29%
Q1
3.53%
Min
-0.80%

SJM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -16.75%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

BTI vs. SJM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BTI

13.86%

Tobacco Industry

Max
18.53%
Q3
15.03%
Median
11.76%
Q1
11.00%
Min
6.94%

BTI’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.86% is around the midpoint for the Tobacco industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SJM

-10.87%

Food Products Industry

Max
24.83%
Q3
14.29%
Median
9.64%
Q1
6.11%
Min
0.08%

SJM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -10.87%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

BTI vs. SJM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBTISJM
Return on Equity (TTM)6.40%-21.99%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.70%-7.92%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.06%-16.75%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.86%-10.87%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)83.38%35.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BTI

0.87

Tobacco Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
1.84
Median
1.26
Q1
0.79
Min
0.39

BTI’s Current Ratio of 0.87 aligns with the median group of the Tobacco industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SJM

0.81

Food Products Industry

Max
3.99
Q3
2.39
Median
1.62
Q1
1.23
Min
0.57

SJM’s Current Ratio of 0.81 falls into the lower quartile for the Food Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BTI vs. SJM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BTI

0.75

Tobacco Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
2.19
Median
0.58
Q1
0.07
Min
0.01

BTI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.75 is typical for the Tobacco industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SJM

1.35

Food Products Industry

Max
1.92
Q3
0.92
Median
0.51
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

SJM’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Food Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.35. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BTI vs. SJM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BTI

-11.45

Tobacco Industry

Max
306.04
Q3
126.21
Median
9.35
Q1
6.32
Min
-11.45

BTI has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -11.45. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

SJM

-1.69

Food Products Industry

Max
65.06
Q3
29.45
Median
9.43
Q1
4.70
Min
-1.69

SJM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -1.69. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

BTI vs. SJM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBTISJM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.870.81
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.550.34
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.751.35
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-11.45-1.69

Growth

Revenue Growth

BTI vs. SJM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BTI vs. SJM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BTI

6.20%

Tobacco Industry

Max
6.77%
Q3
6.12%
Median
5.06%
Q1
3.83%
Min
0.57%

With a Dividend Yield of 6.20%, BTI offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Tobacco industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

SJM

3.96%

Food Products Industry

Max
8.09%
Q3
4.48%
Median
2.69%
Q1
1.66%
Min
0.00%

SJM’s Dividend Yield of 3.96% is consistent with its peers in the Food Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BTI vs. SJM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BTI

57.82%

Tobacco Industry

Max
78.29%
Q3
75.97%
Median
64.37%
Q1
50.14%
Min
49.96%

BTI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 57.82% is within the typical range for the Tobacco industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SJM

59.47%

Food Products Industry

Max
216.00%
Q3
112.15%
Median
72.83%
Q1
41.56%
Min
0.00%

SJM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 59.47% is within the typical range for the Food Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BTI vs. SJM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBTISJM
Dividend Yield (TTM)6.20%3.96%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)57.82%59.47%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BTI

27.23

Tobacco Industry

Max
44.17
Q3
36.23
Median
27.79
Q1
11.97
Min
9.91

BTI’s P/E Ratio of 27.23 is within the middle range for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SJM

--

Food Products Industry

Max
41.70
Q3
24.61
Median
17.81
Q1
12.59
Min
3.07

P/E Ratio data for SJM is currently unavailable.

BTI vs. SJM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BTI

3.29

Tobacco Industry

Max
7.60
Q3
5.15
Median
2.97
Q1
1.39
Min
0.80

BTI’s P/S Ratio of 3.29 aligns with the market consensus for the Tobacco industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SJM

1.32

Food Products Industry

Max
3.33
Q3
1.74
Median
1.10
Q1
0.66
Min
0.11

SJM’s P/S Ratio of 1.32 aligns with the market consensus for the Food Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BTI vs. SJM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Tobacco and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BTI

1.62

Tobacco Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
4.76
Median
3.34
Q1
1.97
Min
1.05

BTI’s P/B Ratio of 1.62 is in the lower quartile for the Tobacco industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SJM

1.93

Food Products Industry

Max
5.01
Q3
2.98
Median
1.93
Q1
1.28
Min
0.47

SJM’s P/B Ratio of 1.93 is within the conventional range for the Food Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BTI vs. SJM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Tobacco and Food Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBTISJM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)27.23--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.291.32
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.621.93
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.7114.14