Seek Returns logo

BSX vs. GH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BSX and GH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBSXGH
Company NameBoston Scientific CorporationGuardant Health, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryHealth Care Equipment & SuppliesHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization157.32 billion USD7.30 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 19, 1992October 4, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BSX and GH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BSX vs. GH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBSXGH
5-Day Price Return3.03%-3.08%
13-Week Price Return1.46%45.38%
26-Week Price Return0.78%24.52%
52-Week Price Return34.72%106.13%
Month-to-Date Return1.19%42.75%
Year-to-Date Return18.86%91.49%
10-Day Avg. Volume6.42M3.41M
3-Month Avg. Volume7.29M2.44M
3-Month Volatility18.94%54.92%
Beta0.641.53

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BSX

11.51%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

BSX’s Return on Equity of 11.51% is on par with the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

GH

-246.60%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

GH has a negative Return on Equity of -246.60%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

BSX vs. GH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BSX

13.55%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.55% places BSX in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

GH

-49.93%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

GH has a negative Net Profit Margin of -49.93%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

BSX vs. GH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BSX

17.02%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

BSX’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.02% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

GH

-54.54%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

GH has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -54.54%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

BSX vs. GH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBSXGH
Return on Equity (TTM)11.51%-246.60%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.30%-29.04%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.55%-49.93%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.02%-54.54%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.30%62.84%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BSX

1.37

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

BSX’s Current Ratio of 1.37 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

GH

3.71

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

GH’s Current Ratio of 3.71 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

BSX vs. GH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BSX

0.52

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

BSX’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 is typical for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

GH

16.78

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 16.78, GH operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Health Care Providers & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

BSX vs. GH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BSX

8.48

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

BSX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.48 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

GH

-150.95

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

GH has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -150.95. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

BSX vs. GH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBSXGH
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.373.71
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.763.19
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.5216.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)8.48-150.95

Growth

Revenue Growth

BSX vs. GH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BSX vs. GH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BSX

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BSX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

GH

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BSX vs. GH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BSX

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BSX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

GH

0.00%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

GH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BSX vs. GH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBSXGH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BSX

62.29

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

A P/E Ratio of 62.29 places BSX in the upper quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

GH

--

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for GH is currently unavailable.

BSX vs. GH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BSX

8.44

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

BSX’s P/S Ratio of 8.44 is in the upper echelon for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

GH

8.74

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 8.74, GH trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BSX vs. GH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BSX

7.09

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

BSX’s P/B Ratio of 7.09 is in the upper tier for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

GH

35.72

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

At 35.72, GH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BSX vs. GH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Health Care Equipment & Supplies and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBSXGH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)62.29--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)8.448.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)7.0935.72
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)44.81--