Seek Returns logo

BSAC vs. OWL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BSAC and OWL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BSAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, OWL is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBSACOWL
Company NameBanco Santander-ChileBlue Owl Capital Inc.
CountryChileUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryBanksCapital Markets
Market Capitalization11.56 billion USD31.05 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 31, 1994December 14, 2020
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BSAC and OWL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BSAC vs. OWL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBSACOWL
5-Day Price Return1.78%5.81%
13-Week Price Return0.68%2.04%
26-Week Price Return11.31%-19.10%
52-Week Price Return31.29%18.30%
Month-to-Date Return2.62%3.57%
Year-to-Date Return21.88%-13.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume92.83M8.33M
3-Month Avg. Volume140.79M8.35M
3-Month Volatility16.43%33.13%
Beta1.071.16

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BSAC

24.56%

Banks Industry

Max
26.37%
Q3
15.92%
Median
12.25%
Q1
8.69%
Min
0.15%

In the upper quartile for the Banks industry, BSAC’s Return on Equity of 24.56% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

OWL

3.42%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

OWL’s Return on Equity of 3.42% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

BSAC vs. OWL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BSAC

19.02%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.70%
Median
28.97%
Q1
22.53%
Min
6.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, BSAC’s Net Profit Margin of 19.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

OWL

2.88%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, OWL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.88% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

BSAC vs. OWL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BSAC

20.34%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.59%
Median
37.24%
Q1
28.25%
Min
13.37%

BSAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.34% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

OWL

17.38%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

OWL’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.38% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

BSAC vs. OWL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBSACOWL
Return on Equity (TTM)24.56%3.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.60%0.65%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)19.02%2.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.34%17.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)----

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BSAC

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

OWL

0.88

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BSAC vs. OWL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BSAC

3.83

Banks Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.62
Median
1.02
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

OWL

1.38

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

BSAC vs. OWL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BSAC

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

OWL

5.03

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

BSAC vs. OWL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBSACOWL
Current Ratio (MRQ)--0.88
Quick Ratio (MRQ)--0.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.831.38
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--5.03

Growth

Revenue Growth

BSAC vs. OWL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BSAC vs. OWL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BSAC

5.53%

Banks Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
5.83%
Median
3.81%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.00%

BSAC’s Dividend Yield of 5.53% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

OWL

1.48%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

OWL’s Dividend Yield of 1.48% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BSAC vs. OWL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BSAC

220.26%

Banks Industry

Max
147.07%
Q3
80.55%
Median
54.40%
Q1
35.71%
Min
0.00%

At 220.26%, BSAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Banks industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

OWL

610.34%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

At 610.34%, OWL’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Capital Markets industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

BSAC vs. OWL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBSACOWL
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.53%1.48%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)220.26%610.34%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BSAC

10.15

Banks Industry

Max
20.05
Q3
12.65
Median
10.21
Q1
7.54
Min
2.74

BSAC’s P/E Ratio of 10.15 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

OWL

411.81

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

At 411.81, OWL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BSAC vs. OWL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BSAC

3.42

Banks Industry

Max
5.06
Q3
2.98
Median
2.24
Q1
1.59
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

OWL

11.86

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

OWL’s P/S Ratio of 11.86 is in the upper echelon for the Capital Markets industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BSAC vs. OWL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BSAC

2.44

Banks Industry

Max
2.18
Q3
1.36
Median
1.09
Q1
0.81
Min
0.20

At 2.44, BSAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Banks industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

OWL

12.65

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

At 12.65, OWL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Capital Markets industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BSAC vs. OWL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBSACOWL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.15411.81
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.4211.86
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.4412.65
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.5029.81