Seek Returns logo

BRKR vs. PHG: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BRKR and PHG, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BRKR is a standard domestic stock, while PHG trades as New York Registered Shares, providing U.S. investors with a way to invest in the foreign-based company.

SymbolBRKRPHG
Company NameBruker CorporationKoninklijke Philips N.V.
CountryUnited StatesNetherlands
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryLife Sciences Tools & ServicesHealth Care Equipment & Supplies
Market Capitalization5.24 billion USD25.94 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateAugust 4, 2000March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockNY Reg Shrs

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BRKR and PHG by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BRKR vs. PHG: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBRKRPHG
5-Day Price Return10.85%2.43%
13-Week Price Return-14.21%7.53%
26-Week Price Return-38.34%-12.97%
52-Week Price Return-42.83%-12.25%
Month-to-Date Return-10.12%0.17%
Year-to-Date Return-41.08%-5.16%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.39M1.49M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.92M1.96M
3-Month Volatility58.88%28.75%
Beta1.211.02

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BRKR

4.42%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.55%
Median
6.22%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

BRKR’s Return on Equity of 4.42% is on par with the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PHG

-0.18%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
34.53%
Q3
19.38%
Median
9.52%
Q1
4.86%
Min
-7.58%

PHG has a negative Return on Equity of -0.18%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

BRKR vs. PHG: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BRKR

2.31%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.28%
Q3
16.17%
Median
7.24%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-3.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, BRKR’s Net Profit Margin of 2.31% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PHG

0.90%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
23.34%
Q3
13.06%
Median
9.53%
Q1
5.96%
Min
-3.87%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s Net Profit Margin of 0.90% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

BRKR vs. PHG: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BRKR

4.93%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.15%
Q3
19.34%
Median
13.02%
Q1
8.05%
Min
-4.38%

BRKR’s Operating Profit Margin of 4.93% is in the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

PHG

6.11%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
29.44%
Q3
17.80%
Median
13.95%
Q1
8.73%
Min
-3.56%

PHG’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.11% is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

BRKR vs. PHG: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBRKRPHG
Return on Equity (TTM)4.42%-0.18%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.32%-0.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.31%0.90%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)4.93%6.11%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.54%43.85%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BRKR

1.61

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.77
Median
1.85
Q1
1.40
Min
0.43

BRKR’s Current Ratio of 1.61 aligns with the median group of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PHG

1.26

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
3.05
Median
2.14
Q1
1.49
Min
0.86

PHG’s Current Ratio of 1.26 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BRKR vs. PHG: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BRKR

1.35

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.83
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

BRKR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.35. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PHG

0.81

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.71
Median
0.45
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

PHG’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.81. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BRKR vs. PHG: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BRKR

14.89

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
29.61
Q3
23.24
Median
6.07
Q1
2.18
Min
-14.08

BRKR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.89 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PHG

1.41

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
58.29
Q3
25.56
Median
9.06
Q1
3.60
Min
-28.92

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 1.41 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

BRKR vs. PHG: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBRKRPHG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.611.26
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.640.81
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.350.81
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.891.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

BRKR vs. PHG: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BRKR vs. PHG: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BRKR

0.59%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.80%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BRKR’s Dividend Yield of 0.59% is consistent with its peers in the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PHG

0.00%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
4.05%
Q3
1.76%
Median
0.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG’s Dividend Yield of 0.00% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BRKR vs. PHG: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BRKR

38.32%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
156.00%
Q3
65.73%
Median
23.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BRKR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.32% is within the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PHG

0.42%

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
160.00%
Q3
72.47%
Median
27.49%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PHG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 0.42% is within the typical range for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BRKR vs. PHG: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBRKRPHG
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.59%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)38.32%0.42%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BRKR

64.42

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
117.96
Q3
65.59
Median
37.26
Q1
27.51
Min
1.73

BRKR’s P/E Ratio of 64.42 is within the middle range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PHG

137.38

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
73.48
Q3
51.69
Median
34.31
Q1
25.74
Min
11.47

At 137.38, PHG’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BRKR vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BRKR

1.49

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
12.46
Q3
6.70
Median
4.24
Q1
2.68
Min
0.73

In the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, BRKR’s P/S Ratio of 1.49 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PHG

1.24

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
9.53
Q3
5.26
Median
3.39
Q1
2.13
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry, PHG’s P/S Ratio of 1.24 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

BRKR vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BRKR

3.46

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
7.99
Q3
4.69
Median
3.30
Q1
1.88
Min
1.02

BRKR’s P/B Ratio of 3.46 is within the conventional range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PHG

1.89

Health Care Equipment & Supplies Industry

Max
10.85
Q3
5.98
Median
3.48
Q1
2.43
Min
0.69

PHG’s P/B Ratio of 1.89 is in the lower quartile for the Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

BRKR vs. PHG: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Equipment & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBRKRPHG
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)64.42137.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.491.24
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.461.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.8914.38