Seek Returns logo

BRK.B vs. LIN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BRK.B and LIN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBRK.BLIN
Company NameBerkshire Hathaway Inc.Linde plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorFinancialsMaterials
GICS IndustryFinancial ServicesChemicals
Market Capitalization1,053.85 billion USD226.18 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateMay 9, 1996June 17, 1992
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BRK.B and LIN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BRK.B vs. LIN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBRK.BLIN
5-Day Price Return1.97%0.99%
13-Week Price Return-4.48%4.79%
26-Week Price Return1.57%4.62%
52-Week Price Return8.90%5.19%
Month-to-Date Return1.80%4.80%
Year-to-Date Return7.62%15.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.00M1.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.00M1.77M
3-Month Volatility12.78%12.85%
Beta0.480.96

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BRK.B

9.68%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

BRK.B’s Return on Equity of 9.68% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

LIN

17.46%

Chemicals Industry

Max
26.17%
Q3
13.48%
Median
8.13%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-11.86%

In the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, LIN’s Return on Equity of 17.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BRK.B vs. LIN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BRK.B

17.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

BRK.B’s Net Profit Margin of 17.00% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

LIN

20.20%

Chemicals Industry

Max
21.80%
Q3
9.57%
Median
4.44%
Q1
1.14%
Min
-11.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.20% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BRK.B vs. LIN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BRK.B

13.29%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

BRK.B’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.29% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

LIN

26.75%

Chemicals Industry

Max
27.33%
Q3
13.97%
Median
8.08%
Q1
4.46%
Min
-8.10%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.75% places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BRK.B vs. LIN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBRK.BLIN
Return on Equity (TTM)9.68%17.46%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.44%8.10%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.00%20.20%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.29%26.75%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)16.97%48.45%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BRK.B

1.95

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

LIN

0.93

Chemicals Industry

Max
3.38
Q3
2.23
Median
1.73
Q1
1.39
Min
0.55

LIN’s Current Ratio of 0.93 falls into the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BRK.B vs. LIN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BRK.B

0.19

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

LIN

0.67

Chemicals Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.94
Median
0.65
Q1
0.41
Min
0.00

LIN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.67 is typical for the Chemicals industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BRK.B vs. LIN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BRK.B

0.57

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

LIN

33.09

Chemicals Industry

Max
56.43
Q3
26.33
Median
9.38
Q1
3.10
Min
-9.39

LIN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 33.09 is in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

BRK.B vs. LIN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBRK.BLIN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.950.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.680.70
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.190.67
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.5733.09

Growth

Revenue Growth

BRK.B vs. LIN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BRK.B vs. LIN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BRK.B

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BRK.B currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

LIN

1.21%

Chemicals Industry

Max
6.56%
Q3
4.04%
Median
2.47%
Q1
1.45%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Yield of 1.21% is in the lower quartile for the Chemicals industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BRK.B vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BRK.B

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

BRK.B has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

LIN

40.71%

Chemicals Industry

Max
181.25%
Q3
95.01%
Median
53.52%
Q1
26.59%
Min
0.00%

LIN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.71% is within the typical range for the Chemicals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BRK.B vs. LIN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBRK.BLIN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.21%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%40.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BRK.B

16.79

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

BRK.B’s P/E Ratio of 16.79 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

LIN

33.69

Chemicals Industry

Max
42.94
Q3
29.77
Median
20.37
Q1
14.27
Min
6.19

A P/E Ratio of 33.69 places LIN in the upper quartile for the Chemicals industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BRK.B vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BRK.B

2.85

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

LIN

6.80

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.36
Q3
2.23
Median
1.01
Q1
0.55
Min
0.16

With a P/S Ratio of 6.80, LIN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Chemicals industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BRK.B vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BRK.B

1.57

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

BRK.B’s P/B Ratio of 1.57 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

LIN

5.73

Chemicals Industry

Max
4.92
Q3
2.56
Median
1.54
Q1
0.97
Min
0.30

At 5.73, LIN’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Chemicals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BRK.B vs. LIN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Chemicals industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBRK.BLIN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.7933.69
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.856.80
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.575.73
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)89.1844.62