BRK.B vs. CIB: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 3, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BRK.B and CIB, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BRK.B is a standard domestic listing, while CIB trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	BRK.B	CIB
Company Name	Berkshire Hathaway Inc.	Grupo Cibest S.A.
Country	United States	Colombia
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Financial Services	Banks
Market Capitalization	1,068.81 billion USD	13.92 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	May 9, 1996	July 26, 1995
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BRK.B and CIB by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BRK.B vs. CIB: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BRK.B	CIB
5-Day Price Return	0.08%	0.67%
13-Week Price Return	1.74%	6.71%
26-Week Price Return	-6.99%	2.79%
52-Week Price Return	7.92%	-27.92%
Month-to-Date Return	-1.10%	2.90%
Year-to-Date Return	9.54%	-28.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.00M	0.05M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.00M	3.15M
3-Month Volatility	12.80%	--
Beta	0.48	1.34

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BRK.B

9.68%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 39.28%
Q3: 18.88%
Median: 9.97%
Q1: 4.03%
Min: -10.25%

BRK.B’s Return on Equity of 9.68% is on par with the norm for the Financial Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CIB

15.44%

Banks Industry

Max: 25.40%
Q3: 15.55%
Median: 12.00%
Q1: 8.98%
Min: -0.10%

CIB’s Return on Equity of 15.44% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BRK.B vs. CIB: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BRK.B

17.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.35%
Median: 12.68%
Q1: 6.11%
Min: -11.69%

BRK.B’s Net Profit Margin of 17.00% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CIB

20.33%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.73%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.56%
Min: 6.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, CIB’s Net Profit Margin of 20.33% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

BRK.B vs. CIB: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BRK.B

13.29%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 75.57%
Q3: 37.78%
Median: 19.09%
Q1: 10.04%
Min: -19.42%

BRK.B’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.29% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CIB

25.93%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.73%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 12.28%

CIB’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.93% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

BRK.B vs. CIB: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BRK.B	CIB
Return on Equity (TTM)	9.68%	15.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)	5.44%	1.76%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	17.00%	20.33%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	13.29%	25.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	16.97%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BRK.B

1.95

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.83
Q3: 2.70
Median: 1.44
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

CIB

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BRK.B vs. CIB: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BRK.B

0.19

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

CIB

0.65

Banks Industry

Max: 5.78
Q3: 2.66
Median: 1.05
Q1: 0.40
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

BRK.B vs. CIB: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BRK.B

0.57

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

CIB

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

BRK.B vs. CIB: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BRK.B	CIB
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.95	--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.68	--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.19	0.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	0.57	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

BRK.B vs. CIB: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BRK.B vs. CIB: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BRK.B

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.12%
Q3: 3.37%
Median: 1.70%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

BRK.B currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CIB

11.03%

Banks Industry

Max: 11.03%
Q3: 6.00%
Median: 3.87%
Q1: 2.41%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 11.03%, CIB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Banks industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

BRK.B vs. CIB: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BRK.B

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 18.23%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

BRK.B has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CIB

53.59%

Banks Industry

Max: 134.24%
Q3: 79.39%
Median: 55.09%
Q1: 36.09%
Min: 0.00%

CIB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 53.59% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BRK.B vs. CIB: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BRK.B	CIB
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	11.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	53.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BRK.B

17.06

Financial Services Industry

Max: 45.81
Q3: 30.21
Median: 16.29
Q1: 10.14
Min: 0.70

BRK.B’s P/E Ratio of 17.06 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CIB

4.86

Banks Industry

Max: 22.69
Q3: 13.75
Median: 10.32
Q1: 7.73
Min: 2.59

In the lower quartile for the Banks industry, CIB’s P/E Ratio of 4.86 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

BRK.B vs. CIB: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BRK.B

2.90

Financial Services Industry

Max: 10.88
Q3: 5.34
Median: 2.64
Q1: 1.24
Min: 0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

CIB

0.89

Banks Industry

Max: 4.90
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

BRK.B vs. CIB: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BRK.B

1.57

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.93
Q3: 3.78
Median: 1.49
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

BRK.B’s P/B Ratio of 1.57 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CIB

1.05

Banks Industry

Max: 2.09
Q3: 1.40
Median: 1.11
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.29

CIB’s P/B Ratio of 1.05 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BRK.B vs. CIB: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Financial Services and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BRK.B	CIB
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	17.06	4.86
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.90	0.89
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.57	1.05
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	90.58	2.04