Seek Returns logo

BR vs. RBLX: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BR and RBLX, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBRRBLX
Company NameBroadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.Roblox Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsCommunication Services
GICS IndustryProfessional ServicesEntertainment
Market Capitalization30.65 billion USD87.89 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 22, 2007March 10, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BR and RBLX by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BR vs. RBLX: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBRRBLX
5-Day Price Return-1.80%-2.20%
13-Week Price Return10.39%72.51%
26-Week Price Return9.02%88.89%
52-Week Price Return23.93%239.71%
Month-to-Date Return5.72%-7.99%
Year-to-Date Return15.74%119.12%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.94M10.15M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.63M8.54M
3-Month Volatility21.04%45.99%
Beta0.981.63

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BR

35.46%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

In the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry, BR’s Return on Equity of 35.46% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RBLX

-354.27%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

RBLX has a negative Return on Equity of -354.27%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

BR vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BR

12.19%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

BR’s Net Profit Margin of 12.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Professional Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RBLX

-23.67%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

RBLX has a negative Net Profit Margin of -23.67%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

BR vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BR

17.25%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

BR’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.25% is around the midpoint for the Professional Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RBLX

-27.35%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

RBLX has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -27.35%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

BR vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBRRBLX
Return on Equity (TTM)35.46%-354.27%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.15%-13.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)12.19%-23.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.25%-27.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.02%78.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BR

0.98

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

BR’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Professional Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

RBLX

0.97

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

RBLX’s Current Ratio of 0.97 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BR vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BR

1.22

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

BR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.22 is typical for the Professional Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

RBLX

2.85

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.85, RBLX operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Entertainment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

BR vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BR

9.63

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

BR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.63 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Professional Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RBLX

-845.00

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

RBLX has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -845.00. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

BR vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBRRBLX
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.980.97
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.980.96
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.222.85
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)9.63-845.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

BR vs. RBLX: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BR vs. RBLX: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BR

1.31%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

BR’s Dividend Yield of 1.31% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BR vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BR

47.91%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

BR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 47.91% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RBLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RBLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BR vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBRRBLX
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.31%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)47.91%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BR

36.53

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

BR’s P/E Ratio of 36.53 is within the middle range for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

RBLX

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

P/E Ratio data for RBLX is currently unavailable.

BR vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BR

4.45

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

BR’s P/S Ratio of 4.45 aligns with the market consensus for the Professional Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

RBLX

21.85

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

With a P/S Ratio of 21.85, RBLX trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Entertainment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BR vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Professional Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BR

10.75

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

BR’s P/B Ratio of 10.75 is in the upper tier for the Professional Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

RBLX

202.01

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

At 202.01, RBLX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BR vs. RBLX: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Professional Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBRRBLX
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)36.53--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.4521.85
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.75202.01
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.2793.32