Seek Returns logo

BP vs. FSLR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BP and FSLR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, FSLR is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolBPFSLR
Company NameBP p.l.c.First Solar, Inc.
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization89.73 billion USD24.81 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 2, 1962November 17, 2006
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BP and FSLR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BP vs. FSLR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBPFSLR
5-Day Price Return0.90%-0.33%
13-Week Price Return12.48%39.39%
26-Week Price Return-0.32%69.84%
52-Week Price Return6.19%0.76%
Month-to-Date Return1.37%4.92%
Year-to-Date Return9.82%31.28%
10-Day Avg. Volume18.48M1.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume32.03M3.37M
3-Month Volatility20.44%45.59%
Beta1.361.60

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BP

0.93%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
27.06%
Q3
16.37%
Median
10.02%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-8.98%

BP’s Return on Equity of 0.93% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FSLR

15.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

FSLR’s Return on Equity of 15.57% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BP vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BP

0.30%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
48.48%
Q3
21.05%
Median
9.42%
Q1
1.67%
Min
-26.95%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, BP’s Net Profit Margin of 0.30% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FSLR

28.95%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

A Net Profit Margin of 28.95% places FSLR in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BP vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BP

3.72%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
31.04%
Median
18.00%
Q1
5.41%
Min
-32.54%

BP’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.72% is in the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FSLR

31.35%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.35% places FSLR in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BP vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBPFSLR
Return on Equity (TTM)0.93%15.57%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.20%10.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)0.30%28.95%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.72%31.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.49%42.76%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BP

1.21

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.60
Q3
1.63
Median
1.22
Q1
0.86
Min
0.30

BP’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FSLR

1.90

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

FSLR’s Current Ratio of 1.90 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BP vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BP

1.27

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

BP’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.27. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FSLR

0.12

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

FSLR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BP vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BP

78.95

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
51.08
Q3
22.26
Median
7.32
Q1
2.72
Min
-19.25

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 78.95, BP demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FSLR

39.40

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

FSLR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 39.40 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BP vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBPFSLR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.211.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.891.36
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.270.12
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)78.9539.40

Growth

Revenue Growth

BP vs. FSLR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BP vs. FSLR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BP

5.68%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
12.74%
Q3
7.02%
Median
4.37%
Q1
2.64%
Min
0.00%

BP’s Dividend Yield of 5.68% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FSLR

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FSLR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BP vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BP

150.36%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
188.73%
Q3
95.12%
Median
63.48%
Q1
28.55%
Min
0.00%

BP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 150.36% is in the upper quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

FSLR

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FSLR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BP vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBPFSLR
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.68%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)150.36%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BP

158.67

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
34.98
Q3
21.60
Median
13.15
Q1
8.17
Min
2.22

At 158.67, BP’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FSLR

19.66

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, FSLR’s P/E Ratio of 19.66 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

BP vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BP

0.48

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.68
Q3
2.73
Median
1.36
Q1
0.54
Min
0.12

In the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, BP’s P/S Ratio of 0.48 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FSLR

5.69

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

FSLR’s P/S Ratio of 5.69 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BP vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BP

1.32

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.23
Q1
0.91
Min
0.34

BP’s P/B Ratio of 1.32 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FSLR

2.08

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

FSLR’s P/B Ratio of 2.08 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BP vs. FSLR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBPFSLR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)158.6719.66
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.485.69
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.322.08
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)9.8149.70