Seek Returns logo

BNT vs. UBS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BNT and UBS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBNTUBS
Company NameBrookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd.UBS Group AG
CountryBermudaSwitzerland
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryInsuranceCapital Markets
Market Capitalization18.31 billion USD126.67 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 28, 2021May 16, 2000
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BNT and UBS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BNT vs. UBS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBNTUBS
5-Day Price Return-1.97%0.85%
13-Week Price Return7.38%15.99%
26-Week Price Return6.89%6.00%
52-Week Price Return39.93%31.64%
Month-to-Date Return-3.43%5.55%
Year-to-Date Return8.25%15.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.02M6.35M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.02M7.36M
3-Month Volatility25.35%23.22%
Beta2.181.50

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BNT

4.66%

Insurance Industry

Max
29.03%
Q3
18.11%
Median
13.90%
Q1
10.42%
Min
-0.64%

BNT’s Return on Equity of 4.66% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

UBS

7.21%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

UBS’s Return on Equity of 7.21% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

BNT vs. UBS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BNT

3.88%

Insurance Industry

Max
26.78%
Q3
14.06%
Median
9.15%
Q1
5.48%
Min
-7.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance industry, BNT’s Net Profit Margin of 3.88% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

UBS

77.37%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

UBS’s Net Profit Margin of 77.37% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Capital Markets industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

BNT vs. UBS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BNT

24.62%

Insurance Industry

Max
35.49%
Q3
19.49%
Median
14.35%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

UBS

81.44%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

An Operating Profit Margin of 81.44% places UBS in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BNT vs. UBS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBNTUBS
Return on Equity (TTM)4.66%7.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.40%0.39%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.88%77.37%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)24.62%81.44%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)----

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BNT

0.13

Insurance Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.33
Median
0.55
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

UBS

--

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BNT vs. UBS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BNT

0.37

Insurance Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.65
Median
0.34
Q1
0.22
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

UBS

4.21

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

BNT vs. UBS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BNT

1.58

Insurance Industry

Max
43.68
Q3
20.84
Median
9.56
Q1
3.34
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

UBS

--

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

BNT vs. UBS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBNTUBS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.13--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.13--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.374.21
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.58--

Growth

Revenue Growth

BNT vs. UBS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BNT vs. UBS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BNT

0.00%

Insurance Industry

Max
8.23%
Q3
4.54%
Median
3.42%
Q1
1.97%
Min
0.00%

BNT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBS

2.26%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

UBS’s Dividend Yield of 2.26% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BNT vs. UBS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BNT

0.00%

Insurance Industry

Max
168.02%
Q3
85.57%
Median
50.71%
Q1
22.04%
Min
0.00%

BNT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBS

119.67%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

UBS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 119.67% is in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

BNT vs. UBS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBNTUBS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%2.26%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%119.67%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BNT

33.15

Insurance Industry

Max
28.91
Q3
17.76
Median
13.63
Q1
10.02
Min
2.89

At 33.15, BNT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Insurance industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

UBS

20.20

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

UBS’s P/E Ratio of 20.20 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BNT vs. UBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BNT

1.29

Insurance Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
1.98
Median
1.23
Q1
0.81
Min
0.23

BNT’s P/S Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the market consensus for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBS

2.27

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

UBS’s P/S Ratio of 2.27 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BNT vs. UBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BNT

0.19

Insurance Industry

Max
4.37
Q3
2.48
Median
1.68
Q1
1.19
Min
0.19

BNT’s P/B Ratio of 0.19 is below the established floor for the Insurance industry. This may signal that the market is deeply pessimistic or has overlooked the company, potentially offering its asset base at a significant discount.

UBS

1.25

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

UBS’s P/B Ratio of 1.25 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BNT vs. UBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBNTUBS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)33.1520.20
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.292.27
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.191.25
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)3.795.44