BNT vs. FDS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 19, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BNT and FDS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	BNT	FDS
Company Name	Brookfield Wealth Solutions Ltd.	FactSet Research Systems Inc.
Country	Bermuda	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Insurance	Capital Markets
Market Capitalization	18.86 billion USD	14.22 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 28, 2021	June 28, 1996
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BNT and FDS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BNT vs. FDS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BNT	FDS
5-Day Price Return	-2.62%	-2.71%
13-Week Price Return	14.46%	-17.57%
26-Week Price Return	6.12%	-19.83%
52-Week Price Return	49.45%	-5.25%
Month-to-Date Return	-2.27%	-6.63%
Year-to-Date Return	9.55%	-21.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.03M	0.47M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.03M	0.35M
3-Month Volatility	26.47%	20.09%
Beta	2.10	0.84

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BNT

4.66%

Insurance Industry

Max: 29.03%
Q3: 18.11%
Median: 13.90%
Q1: 10.42%
Min: -0.64%

BNT’s Return on Equity of 4.66% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

FDS

26.26%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

In the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry, FDS’s Return on Equity of 26.26% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BNT vs. FDS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BNT

3.88%

Insurance Industry

Max: 26.78%
Q3: 14.06%
Median: 9.15%
Q1: 5.48%
Min: -7.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance industry, BNT’s Net Profit Margin of 3.88% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FDS

23.30%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

FDS’s Net Profit Margin of 23.30% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BNT vs. FDS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BNT

24.62%

Insurance Industry

Max: 35.49%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 14.35%
Q1: 8.53%
Min: -5.25%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

FDS

30.56%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

FDS’s Operating Profit Margin of 30.56% is around the midpoint for the Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BNT vs. FDS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BNT	FDS
Return on Equity (TTM)	4.66%	26.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.40%	12.78%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	3.88%	23.30%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	24.62%	30.56%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	53.33%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BNT

0.13

Insurance Industry

Max: 2.97
Q3: 1.33
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.15
Min: 0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

FDS

1.47

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BNT vs. FDS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BNT

0.37

Insurance Industry

Max: 1.25
Q3: 0.65
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.22
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

FDS

0.66

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

BNT vs. FDS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BNT

1.58

Insurance Industry

Max: 43.68
Q3: 20.84
Median: 9.56
Q1: 3.34
Min: -5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

FDS

13.69

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

BNT vs. FDS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BNT	FDS
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.13	1.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.13	1.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.37	0.66
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	1.58	13.69

Growth

Revenue Growth

BNT vs. FDS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BNT vs. FDS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BNT

0.00%

Insurance Industry

Max: 8.23%
Q3: 4.54%
Median: 3.42%
Q1: 1.97%
Min: 0.00%

BNT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FDS

1.11%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

FDS’s Dividend Yield of 1.11% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BNT vs. FDS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BNT

0.00%

Insurance Industry

Max: 168.02%
Q3: 85.57%
Median: 50.71%
Q1: 22.04%
Min: 0.00%

BNT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FDS

29.59%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

FDS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.59% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

BNT vs. FDS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BNT	FDS
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	1.11%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	29.59%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BNT

28.87

Insurance Industry

Max: 28.91
Q3: 17.76
Median: 13.63
Q1: 10.02
Min: 2.89

A P/E Ratio of 28.87 places BNT in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FDS

26.71

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

FDS’s P/E Ratio of 26.71 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BNT vs. FDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BNT

1.12

Insurance Industry

Max: 3.72
Q3: 1.98
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.23

BNT’s P/S Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the market consensus for the Insurance industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

FDS

6.22

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

FDS’s P/S Ratio of 6.22 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BNT vs. FDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BNT

0.19

Insurance Industry

Max: 4.37
Q3: 2.48
Median: 1.68
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.19

BNT’s P/B Ratio of 0.19 is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

FDS

8.04

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

FDS’s P/B Ratio of 8.04 is in the upper tier for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BNT vs. FDS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Insurance and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BNT	FDS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	28.87	26.71
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.12	6.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	0.19	8.04
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	3.30	24.69