BNT vs. CNA: Brookfield Wealth vs. CNA Financial Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Brookfield Wealth (BNT) and CNA Financial (CNA) both belong to the Insurance industry, though BNT is classified under Life & Health Insurance while CNA falls under Property & Casualty Insurance.

CNA Financial (CNA) has more than two decades of public-market history since February 21, 1973, whereas Brookfield Wealth (BNT) listed on June 28, 2021 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Brookfield Wealth (BNT) has an aggressive beta of 1.57, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while CNA Financial (CNA) is defensive at 0.22 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

CNA Financial (CNA) at 9.56% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 1.05% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

CNA Financial (CNA) at 6.80% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 1.06% retains only a bottom-quartile share.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for Brookfield Wealth (BNT) in Insurance and CNA Financial (CNA) in Insurance, funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

CNA Financial (CNA) at 5.10% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at -20.37% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

CNA Financial (CNA) at 33.24% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at -53.90% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Brookfield Wealth (BNT) in Insurance and CNA Financial (CNA) in Insurance both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Brookfield Wealth (BNT) in Insurance and CNA Financial (CNA) in Insurance run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

CNA Financial (CNA) at 3.95% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 0.62% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CNA the richer one.

Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 30.95% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while CNA Financial (CNA) at 50.26% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

CNA Financial (CNA) at 12.52 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 49.19 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for BNT’s trailing earnings.

CNA Financial (CNA) at 0.84 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 0.96 prices around its industry’s middle — CNA costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

Brookfield Wealth (BNT) at 0.84 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while CNA Financial (CNA) at 1.25 is valued near its industry’s middle — BNT is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

Valuation Metrics