Seek Returns logo

BNS vs. EQH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BNS and EQH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBNSEQH
Company NameThe Bank of Nova ScotiaEquitable Holdings, Inc.
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryBanksFinancial Services
Market Capitalization71.78 billion USD15.60 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 7, 2002May 10, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BNS and EQH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BNS vs. EQH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBNSEQH
5-Day Price Return1.49%-4.69%
13-Week Price Return11.39%-3.03%
26-Week Price Return10.05%-3.09%
52-Week Price Return23.22%26.96%
Month-to-Date Return3.39%1.42%
Year-to-Date Return3.25%10.41%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.35M3.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.25M2.56M
3-Month Volatility7.96%26.63%
Beta0.701.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BNS

7.96%

Banks Industry

Max
26.37%
Q3
15.92%
Median
12.25%
Q1
8.69%
Min
0.15%

BNS’s Return on Equity of 7.96% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

EQH

22.93%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, EQH’s Return on Equity of 22.93% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BNS vs. EQH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BNS

26.04%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.70%
Median
28.97%
Q1
22.53%
Min
6.98%

BNS’s Net Profit Margin of 26.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

EQH

3.02%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Financial Services industry, EQH’s Net Profit Margin of 3.02% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

BNS vs. EQH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BNS

34.15%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.59%
Median
37.24%
Q1
28.25%
Min
13.37%

BNS’s Operating Profit Margin of 34.15% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

EQH

17.41%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

EQH’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.41% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BNS vs. EQH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBNSEQH
Return on Equity (TTM)7.96%22.93%
Return on Assets (TTM)0.47%0.16%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)26.04%3.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)34.15%17.41%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)--51.52%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BNS

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

EQH

1.64

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

BNS vs. EQH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BNS

2.62

Banks Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.62
Median
1.02
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

EQH

20.11

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

BNS vs. EQH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BNS

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

EQH

1.76

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

BNS vs. EQH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBNSEQH
Current Ratio (MRQ)--1.64
Quick Ratio (MRQ)--1.64
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.6220.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)--1.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

BNS vs. EQH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BNS vs. EQH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BNS

5.88%

Banks Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
5.83%
Median
3.81%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.88%, BNS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Banks industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

EQH

2.43%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Yield of 2.43% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BNS vs. EQH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BNS

86.66%

Banks Industry

Max
147.07%
Q3
80.55%
Median
54.40%
Q1
35.71%
Min
0.00%

BNS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 86.66% is in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

EQH

21.08%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

EQH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.08% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BNS vs. EQH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBNSEQH
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.88%2.43%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)86.66%21.08%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BNS

14.74

Banks Industry

Max
20.05
Q3
12.65
Median
10.21
Q1
7.54
Min
2.74

A P/E Ratio of 14.74 places BNS in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EQH

32.57

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

A P/E Ratio of 32.57 places EQH in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BNS vs. EQH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BNS

2.29

Banks Industry

Max
5.06
Q3
2.98
Median
2.24
Q1
1.59
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

EQH

0.98

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

BNS vs. EQH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BNS

1.01

Banks Industry

Max
2.18
Q3
1.36
Median
1.09
Q1
0.81
Min
0.20

BNS’s P/B Ratio of 1.01 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EQH

14.84

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

At 14.84, EQH’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BNS vs. EQH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBNSEQH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)14.7432.57
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.290.98
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.0114.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)4.6310.33