Seek Returns logo

BMY vs. HLN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BMY and HLN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BMY is a standard domestic listing, while HLN trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolBMYHLN
Company NameBristol-Myers Squibb CompanyHaleon plc
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorHealth CareConsumer Staples
GICS IndustryPharmaceuticalsPersonal Care Products
Market Capitalization97.40 billion USD43.48 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1972July 25, 2022
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BMY and HLN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BMY vs. HLN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBMYHLN
5-Day Price Return5.49%1.98%
13-Week Price Return-0.68%-10.35%
26-Week Price Return-16.67%-6.08%
52-Week Price Return1.68%-5.03%
Month-to-Date Return10.48%-1.25%
Year-to-Date Return-15.40%-5.94%
10-Day Avg. Volume15.20M18.28M
3-Month Avg. Volume14.69M18.67M
3-Month Volatility30.84%16.25%
Beta0.350.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BMY

29.57%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
38.59%
Q3
19.84%
Median
11.90%
Q1
5.63%
Min
-9.96%

In the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry, BMY’s Return on Equity of 29.57% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

HLN

3.26%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
31.59%
Q3
20.42%
Median
11.01%
Q1
3.26%
Min
-18.42%

HLN’s Return on Equity of 3.26% is on par with the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BMY vs. HLN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BMY

10.59%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
34.51%
Q3
17.73%
Median
12.12%
Q1
5.99%
Min
-7.73%

BMY’s Net Profit Margin of 10.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

HLN

12.84%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
15.12%
Q3
12.06%
Median
9.26%
Q1
5.50%
Min
-0.40%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.84% places HLN in the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BMY vs. HLN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BMY

17.82%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
41.53%
Q3
23.00%
Median
16.24%
Q1
9.24%
Min
-6.94%

BMY’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.82% is around the midpoint for the Pharmaceuticals industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HLN

19.64%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
19.80%
Q3
17.96%
Median
13.14%
Q1
7.58%
Min
-4.25%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.64% places HLN in the upper quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BMY vs. HLN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBMYHLN
Return on Equity (TTM)29.57%3.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.41%1.58%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)10.59%12.84%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.82%19.64%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)73.92%60.75%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BMY

1.21

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
4.49
Q3
2.77
Median
1.74
Q1
1.26
Min
0.11

BMY’s Current Ratio of 1.21 falls into the lower quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HLN

0.87

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.26
Q3
2.61
Median
1.74
Q1
1.13
Min
0.76

HLN’s Current Ratio of 0.87 falls into the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BMY vs. HLN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BMY

2.82

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
2.44
Q3
1.07
Median
0.42
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.82, BMY operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Pharmaceuticals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

HLN

0.53

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
1.13
Q3
0.63
Median
0.26
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

HLN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.53 is typical for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BMY vs. HLN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BMY

-4.77

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
103.95
Q3
44.18
Median
9.83
Q1
2.82
Min
-42.71

BMY has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.77. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

HLN

8.00

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
96.53
Q3
59.91
Median
22.25
Q1
7.85
Min
-1.93

HLN’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.00 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Personal Care Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BMY vs. HLN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBMYHLN
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.210.87
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.110.63
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.820.53
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-4.778.00

Growth

Revenue Growth

BMY vs. HLN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BMY vs. HLN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BMY

5.14%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
6.98%
Q3
3.32%
Median
2.13%
Q1
0.14%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.14%, BMY offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Pharmaceuticals industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

HLN

0.72%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
4.08%
Q3
2.46%
Median
1.82%
Q1
0.83%
Min
0.00%

HLN’s Dividend Yield of 0.72% is in the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BMY vs. HLN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BMY

98.10%

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
165.20%
Q3
90.59%
Median
49.13%
Q1
28.91%
Min
0.00%

BMY’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 98.10% is in the upper quartile for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

HLN

954.40%

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
207.61%
Q3
115.17%
Median
69.37%
Q1
47.71%
Min
0.00%

At 954.40%, HLN’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Personal Care Products industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

BMY vs. HLN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBMYHLN
Dividend Yield (TTM)5.14%0.72%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)98.10%954.40%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BMY

19.09

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
42.51
Q3
26.88
Median
19.11
Q1
15.12
Min
0.00

BMY’s P/E Ratio of 19.09 is within the middle range for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

HLN

22.09

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
36.75
Median
26.49
Q1
22.40
Min
11.12

In the lower quartile for the Personal Care Products industry, HLN’s P/E Ratio of 22.09 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

BMY vs. HLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BMY

2.02

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.54
Median
2.11
Q1
1.52
Min
0.00

BMY’s P/S Ratio of 2.02 aligns with the market consensus for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

HLN

2.84

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
5.35
Q3
2.83
Median
2.07
Q1
1.13
Min
0.00

HLN’s P/S Ratio of 2.84 is in the upper echelon for the Personal Care Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BMY vs. HLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BMY

5.40

Pharmaceuticals Industry

Max
9.78
Q3
4.96
Median
2.23
Q1
1.46
Min
0.60

BMY’s P/B Ratio of 5.40 is in the upper tier for the Pharmaceuticals industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

HLN

2.11

Personal Care Products Industry

Max
7.32
Q3
5.26
Median
2.93
Q1
1.84
Min
1.14

HLN’s P/B Ratio of 2.11 is within the conventional range for the Personal Care Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BMY vs. HLN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBMYHLN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.0922.09
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.022.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.402.11
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)6.6114.81