Seek Returns logo

BMI vs. FTV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BMI and FTV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBMIFTV
Company NameBadger Meter, Inc.Fortive Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectronic Equipment, Instruments & ComponentsMachinery
Market Capitalization5.21 billion USD16.94 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973July 5, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BMI and FTV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BMI vs. FTV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBMIFTV
5-Day Price Return3.63%5.06%
13-Week Price Return-27.10%-5.79%
26-Week Price Return-7.17%-32.86%
52-Week Price Return-17.42%-36.55%
Month-to-Date Return-2.37%2.22%
Year-to-Date Return-15.81%-33.23%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.45M3.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.33M3.96M
3-Month Volatility41.39%22.54%
Beta0.951.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BMI

21.57%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
21.57%
Q3
13.27%
Median
8.55%
Q1
4.42%
Min
-4.21%

In the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, BMI’s Return on Equity of 21.57% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

FTV

7.44%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

FTV’s Return on Equity of 7.44% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

BMI vs. FTV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BMI

15.53%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
17.31%
Q3
10.85%
Median
7.26%
Q1
3.13%
Min
-3.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.53% places BMI in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

FTV

12.51%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 12.51% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BMI vs. FTV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BMI

19.93%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
30.04%
Q3
15.08%
Median
9.55%
Q1
4.27%
Min
-3.83%

An Operating Profit Margin of 19.93% places BMI in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

FTV

17.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.22% places FTV in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BMI vs. FTV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBMIFTV
Return on Equity (TTM)21.57%7.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)15.71%4.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.53%12.51%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)19.93%17.22%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.18%59.78%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BMI

3.23

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.85
Median
2.03
Q1
1.51
Min
0.62

BMI’s Current Ratio of 3.23 is in the upper quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

FTV

0.98

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

FTV’s Current Ratio of 0.98 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BMI vs. FTV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BMI

0.00

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
0.54
Median
0.30
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, BMI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FTV

0.46

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

FTV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.46 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BMI vs. FTV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BMI

206.33

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
79.05
Q3
36.62
Median
12.51
Q1
3.72
Min
-18.73

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 206.33, BMI demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

FTV

6.04

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

In the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, FTV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.04 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

BMI vs. FTV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBMIFTV
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.230.98
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.040.77
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.000.46
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)206.336.04

Growth

Revenue Growth

BMI vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BMI vs. FTV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BMI

0.76%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
5.36%
Q3
2.53%
Median
1.28%
Q1
0.16%
Min
0.00%

BMI’s Dividend Yield of 0.76% is consistent with its peers in the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

FTV

0.65%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Yield of 0.65% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BMI vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BMI

29.46%

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
218.94%
Q3
90.25%
Median
38.81%
Q1
3.69%
Min
0.00%

BMI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.46% is within the typical range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

FTV

14.22%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

FTV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.22% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

BMI vs. FTV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBMIFTV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.76%0.65%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)29.46%14.22%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BMI

38.55

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
74.74
Q3
42.40
Median
26.55
Q1
20.05
Min
10.12

BMI’s P/E Ratio of 38.55 is within the middle range for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FTV

21.88

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

FTV’s P/E Ratio of 21.88 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BMI vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BMI

5.99

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.79
Q3
3.58
Median
2.05
Q1
1.29
Min
0.20

BMI’s P/S Ratio of 5.99 is in the upper echelon for the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FTV

2.74

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

FTV’s P/S Ratio of 2.74 aligns with the market consensus for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BMI vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BMI

10.65

Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry

Max
6.92
Q3
3.80
Median
2.23
Q1
1.42
Min
0.44

At 10.65, BMI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FTV

2.34

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

FTV’s P/B Ratio of 2.34 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BMI vs. FTV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBMIFTV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)38.5521.88
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.992.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.652.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)32.6912.14