Seek Returns logo

BLDR vs. XYL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BLDR and XYL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBLDRXYL
Company NameBuilders FirstSource, Inc.Xylem Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsMachinery
Market Capitalization15.96 billion USD34.94 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 28, 2005October 13, 2011
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BLDR and XYL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BLDR vs. XYL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBLDRXYL
5-Day Price Return10.01%0.03%
13-Week Price Return22.38%12.79%
26-Week Price Return-9.68%9.21%
52-Week Price Return-5.81%12.57%
Month-to-Date Return13.58%-0.75%
Year-to-Date Return1.03%23.71%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.71M1.44M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.18M1.46M
3-Month Volatility50.35%25.73%
Beta1.681.14

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BLDR

17.49%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

BLDR’s Return on Equity of 17.49% is on par with the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

XYL

8.70%

Machinery Industry

Max
34.68%
Q3
19.06%
Median
13.13%
Q1
8.53%
Min
-4.87%

XYL’s Return on Equity of 8.70% is on par with the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BLDR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

4.74%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s Net Profit Margin of 4.74% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

XYL

10.74%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.74%
Q3
11.24%
Median
8.13%
Q1
5.38%
Min
-1.11%

XYL’s Net Profit Margin of 10.74% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Machinery industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BLDR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

7.70%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

BLDR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.70% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

XYL

11.81%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
16.15%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-4.91%

XYL’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.81% is around the midpoint for the Machinery industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BLDR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBLDRXYL
Return on Equity (TTM)17.49%8.70%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.82%5.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.74%10.74%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.70%11.81%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.58%37.81%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.79

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

BLDR’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

XYL

1.90

Machinery Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.32
Median
1.72
Q1
1.28
Min
0.78

XYL’s Current Ratio of 1.90 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BLDR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.12

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

BLDR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.12. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

XYL

0.18

Machinery Industry

Max
1.49
Q3
0.75
Median
0.44
Q1
0.26
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, XYL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.18 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BLDR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

7.68

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

BLDR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

XYL

55.35

Machinery Industry

Max
67.55
Q3
33.79
Median
13.87
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

XYL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 55.35 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

BLDR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBLDRXYL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.791.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.081.31
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.120.18
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.6855.35

Growth

Revenue Growth

BLDR vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BLDR vs. XYL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

BLDR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

XYL

1.05%

Machinery Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.84%
Median
1.87%
Q1
1.09%
Min
0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Yield of 1.05% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BLDR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

BLDR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

XYL

39.55%

Machinery Industry

Max
202.17%
Q3
98.65%
Median
55.54%
Q1
29.03%
Min
0.00%

XYL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.55% is within the typical range for the Machinery industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BLDR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBLDRXYL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.05%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%39.55%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

20.43

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

BLDR’s P/E Ratio of 20.43 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

XYL

37.52

Machinery Industry

Max
53.66
Q3
31.29
Median
22.00
Q1
16.18
Min
7.00

A P/E Ratio of 37.52 places XYL in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BLDR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.97

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s P/S Ratio of 0.97 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

XYL

4.03

Machinery Industry

Max
5.04
Q3
2.72
Median
1.67
Q1
1.04
Min
0.24

XYL’s P/S Ratio of 4.03 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BLDR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

3.09

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

BLDR’s P/B Ratio of 3.09 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

XYL

2.84

Machinery Industry

Max
7.23
Q3
3.90
Median
2.52
Q1
1.47
Min
0.49

XYL’s P/B Ratio of 2.84 is within the conventional range for the Machinery industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BLDR vs. XYL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBLDRXYL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.4337.52
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.974.03
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.092.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.0040.41