Seek Returns logo

BLDR vs. WMS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BLDR and WMS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBLDRWMS
Company NameBuilders FirstSource, Inc.Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsBuilding Products
Market Capitalization14.01 billion USD10.94 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 28, 2005July 25, 2014
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BLDR and WMS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BLDR vs. WMS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBLDRWMS
5-Day Price Return1.68%0.33%
13-Week Price Return3.91%20.76%
26-Week Price Return-6.00%23.64%
52-Week Price Return-37.58%-13.47%
Month-to-Date Return-12.57%-3.66%
Year-to-Date Return-15.17%19.98%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.24M0.76M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.16M0.80M
3-Month Volatility49.67%49.43%
Beta1.631.35

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BLDR

17.49%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

BLDR’s Return on Equity of 17.49% is on par with the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WMS

27.05%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

WMS’s Return on Equity of 27.05% is on par with the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BLDR vs. WMS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

4.74%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s Net Profit Margin of 4.74% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

WMS

14.82%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.82% places WMS in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BLDR vs. WMS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

7.70%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

BLDR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.70% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

WMS

21.82%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.82% places WMS in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BLDR vs. WMS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBLDRWMS
Return on Equity (TTM)17.49%27.05%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.82%11.74%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.74%14.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.70%21.82%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.58%37.42%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.79

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

BLDR’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WMS

3.22

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

WMS’s Current Ratio of 3.22 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Building Products industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

BLDR vs. WMS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.12

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

BLDR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.12. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

WMS

0.81

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

WMS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.81 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BLDR vs. WMS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

7.68

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

BLDR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WMS

9.67

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

WMS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.67 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BLDR vs. WMS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBLDRWMS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.793.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.082.25
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.120.81
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.689.67

Growth

Revenue Growth

BLDR vs. WMS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BLDR vs. WMS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

BLDR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

WMS

0.48%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

WMS’s Dividend Yield of 0.48% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BLDR vs. WMS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

BLDR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

WMS

11.85%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

WMS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.85% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

BLDR vs. WMS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBLDRWMS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.48%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%11.85%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

18.05

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

BLDR’s P/E Ratio of 18.05 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WMS

24.92

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

WMS’s P/E Ratio of 24.92 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BLDR vs. WMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.86

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s P/S Ratio of 0.86 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

WMS

3.69

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

WMS’s P/S Ratio of 3.69 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BLDR vs. WMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

3.09

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

BLDR’s P/B Ratio of 3.09 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

WMS

5.07

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

WMS’s P/B Ratio of 5.07 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

BLDR vs. WMS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBLDRWMS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.0524.92
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.863.69
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.095.07
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.4822.92