Seek Returns logo

BLDR vs. URI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BLDR and URI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBLDRURI
Company NameBuilders FirstSource, Inc.United Rentals, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization14.68 billion USD58.03 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 28, 2005December 18, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BLDR and URI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BLDR vs. URI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBLDRURI
5-Day Price Return-4.33%-2.12%
13-Week Price Return14.51%24.57%
26-Week Price Return-8.36%23.65%
52-Week Price Return-14.26%25.28%
Month-to-Date Return8.67%2.14%
Year-to-Date Return-3.34%28.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.94M0.44M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.14M0.57M
3-Month Volatility48.27%30.56%
Beta1.671.75

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BLDR

17.49%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

BLDR’s Return on Equity of 17.49% is on par with the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

URI

28.97%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

In the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, URI’s Return on Equity of 28.97% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BLDR vs. URI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

4.74%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s Net Profit Margin of 4.74% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

URI

16.11%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.11% places URI in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BLDR vs. URI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

7.70%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

BLDR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.70% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

URI

25.50%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.50% places URI in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BLDR vs. URI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBLDRURI
Return on Equity (TTM)17.49%28.97%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.82%8.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.74%16.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.70%25.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.58%39.21%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.79

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

BLDR’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

URI

0.86

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

URI’s Current Ratio of 0.86 falls into the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BLDR vs. URI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.12

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

BLDR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.12. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

URI

1.48

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

URI’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BLDR vs. URI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

7.68

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

BLDR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

URI

5.90

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

URI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.90 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BLDR vs. URI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBLDRURI
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.790.86
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.080.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.121.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.685.90

Growth

Revenue Growth

BLDR vs. URI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BLDR vs. URI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

BLDR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

URI

0.78%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

URI’s Dividend Yield of 0.78% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BLDR vs. URI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

BLDR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

URI

17.74%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

URI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.74% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

BLDR vs. URI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBLDRURI
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.78%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%17.74%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

20.15

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

BLDR’s P/E Ratio of 20.15 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

URI

22.88

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

URI’s P/E Ratio of 22.88 is within the middle range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BLDR vs. URI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.96

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s P/S Ratio of 0.96 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

URI

3.68

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

URI’s P/S Ratio of 3.68 is in the upper echelon for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BLDR vs. URI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

3.09

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

BLDR’s P/B Ratio of 3.09 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

URI

5.42

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

URI’s P/B Ratio of 5.42 is in the upper tier for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BLDR vs. URI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBLDRURI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.1522.88
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.963.68
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.095.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)12.8255.53