BLDR vs. TT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 12, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BLDR and TT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	BLDR	TT
Company Name	Builders FirstSource, Inc.	Trane Technologies plc
Country	United States	Ireland
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Building Products	Building Products
Market Capitalization	14.32 billion USD	94.87 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 28, 2005	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BLDR and TT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BLDR vs. TT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	TT
5-Day Price Return	1.43%	0.67%
13-Week Price Return	-2.60%	-1.67%
26-Week Price Return	8.11%	28.80%
52-Week Price Return	-32.59%	9.23%
Month-to-Date Return	6.84%	1.05%
Year-to-Date Return	-9.37%	15.44%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.68M	1.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.13M	1.25M
3-Month Volatility	47.35%	25.09%
Beta	1.59	1.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BLDR

17.49%

Building Products Industry

Max: 46.90%
Q3: 27.60%
Median: 15.43%
Q1: 8.94%
Min: 0.77%

BLDR’s Return on Equity of 17.49% is on par with the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TT

37.61%

Building Products Industry

Max: 46.90%
Q3: 27.60%
Median: 15.43%
Q1: 8.94%
Min: 0.77%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, TT’s Return on Equity of 37.61% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

BLDR vs. TT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

4.74%

Building Products Industry

Max: 19.42%
Q3: 13.74%
Median: 8.72%
Q1: 4.81%
Min: 0.46%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s Net Profit Margin of 4.74% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TT

13.76%

Building Products Industry

Max: 19.42%
Q3: 13.74%
Median: 8.72%
Q1: 4.81%
Min: 0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.76% places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BLDR vs. TT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

7.70%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.72%
Q3: 17.70%
Median: 12.14%
Q1: 9.54%
Min: 1.65%

BLDR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.70% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TT

18.39%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.72%
Q3: 17.70%
Median: 12.14%
Q1: 9.54%
Min: 1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.39% places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BLDR vs. TT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	TT
Return on Equity (TTM)	17.49%	37.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)	6.82%	13.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	4.74%	13.76%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	7.70%	18.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	31.58%	36.26%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.79

Building Products Industry

Max: 3.10
Q3: 2.06
Median: 1.60
Q1: 1.30
Min: 0.88

BLDR’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TT

1.10

Building Products Industry

Max: 3.10
Q3: 2.06
Median: 1.60
Q1: 1.30
Min: 0.88

TT’s Current Ratio of 1.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BLDR vs. TT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.12

Building Products Industry

Max: 1.64
Q3: 1.02
Median: 0.62
Q1: 0.20
Min: 0.00

BLDR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.12. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TT

0.59

Building Products Industry

Max: 1.64
Q3: 1.02
Median: 0.62
Q1: 0.20
Min: 0.00

TT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BLDR vs. TT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

7.68

Building Products Industry

Max: 72.12
Q3: 34.39
Median: 23.97
Q1: 7.29
Min: 2.97

BLDR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TT

15.31

Building Products Industry

Max: 72.12
Q3: 34.39
Median: 23.97
Q1: 7.29
Min: 2.97

TT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BLDR vs. TT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	TT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.79	1.10
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.08	0.76
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.12	0.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	7.68	15.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

BLDR vs. TT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BLDR vs. TT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.51%
Q3: 1.92%
Median: 1.30%
Q1: 0.78%
Min: 0.00%

BLDR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TT

0.84%

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.51%
Q3: 1.92%
Median: 1.30%
Q1: 0.78%
Min: 0.00%

TT’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BLDR vs. TT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max: 157.36%
Q3: 76.90%
Median: 30.70%
Q1: 17.97%
Min: 0.00%

BLDR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TT

27.94%

Building Products Industry

Max: 157.36%
Q3: 76.90%
Median: 30.70%
Q1: 17.97%
Min: 0.00%

TT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.94% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BLDR vs. TT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	TT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.84%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	27.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

18.49

Building Products Industry

Max: 45.60
Q3: 30.36
Median: 21.97
Q1: 17.37
Min: 12.44

BLDR’s P/E Ratio of 18.49 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TT

33.31

Building Products Industry

Max: 45.60
Q3: 30.36
Median: 21.97
Q1: 17.37
Min: 12.44

A P/E Ratio of 33.31 places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BLDR vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.88

Building Products Industry

Max: 5.90
Q3: 3.09
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.07
Min: 0.37

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s P/S Ratio of 0.88 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TT

4.59

Building Products Industry

Max: 5.90
Q3: 3.09
Median: 1.72
Q1: 1.07
Min: 0.37

TT’s P/S Ratio of 4.59 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BLDR vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

3.09

Building Products Industry

Max: 10.99
Q3: 5.69
Median: 2.98
Q1: 1.80
Min: 0.66

BLDR’s P/B Ratio of 3.09 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TT

12.45

Building Products Industry

Max: 10.99
Q3: 5.69
Median: 2.98
Q1: 1.80
Min: 0.66

At 12.45, TT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BLDR vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Building Products industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	TT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	18.49	33.31
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.88	4.59
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.09	12.45
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	11.77	33.84