BLDR vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 25, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BLDR and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

BLDR is a standard domestic listing, while PAC trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	BLDR	PAC
Company Name	Builders FirstSource, Inc.	Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
Country	United States	Mexico
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Building Products	Transportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization	15.97 billion USD	12.48 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 28, 2005	February 27, 2006
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BLDR and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BLDR vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	PAC
5-Day Price Return	5.81%	-2.95%
13-Week Price Return	33.28%	-0.18%
26-Week Price Return	-2.37%	13.31%
52-Week Price Return	-14.15%	51.23%
Month-to-Date Return	13.62%	5.75%
Year-to-Date Return	1.06%	25.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.20M	0.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.17M	0.69M
3-Month Volatility	50.79%	24.54%
Beta	1.68	1.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BLDR

17.49%

Building Products Industry

Max: 48.58%
Q3: 27.65%
Median: 16.01%
Q1: 8.81%
Min: -6.66%

BLDR’s Return on Equity of 17.49% is on par with the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PAC

42.80%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 26.85%
Q3: 15.47%
Median: 10.39%
Q1: 7.70%
Min: 0.79%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 42.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BLDR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

4.74%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.11%
Q3: 15.09%
Median: 9.48%
Q1: 5.16%
Min: -3.43%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s Net Profit Margin of 4.74% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PAC

23.19%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 49.26%
Q3: 27.75%
Median: 17.98%
Q1: 10.18%
Min: 4.19%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 23.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BLDR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

7.70%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.67%
Q3: 18.75%
Median: 14.89%
Q1: 8.70%
Min: -1.00%

BLDR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.70% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

PAC

42.29%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 60.91%
Q3: 43.57%
Median: 30.58%
Q1: 16.77%
Min: 1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.29% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BLDR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	PAC
Return on Equity (TTM)	17.49%	42.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)	6.82%	11.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	4.74%	23.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	7.70%	42.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	31.58%	100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.79

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.87
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.60
Q1: 1.32
Min: 0.88

BLDR’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PAC

0.93

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 3.35
Q3: 1.90
Median: 1.35
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.28

PAC’s Current Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the median group of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BLDR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.12

Building Products Industry

Max: 1.64
Q3: 1.02
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

BLDR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.12. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PAC

2.48

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 3.70
Q3: 1.70
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BLDR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

7.68

Building Products Industry

Max: 72.12
Q3: 34.39
Median: 15.31
Q1: 6.06
Min: 0.85

BLDR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 29.26
Q3: 20.33
Median: 8.92
Q1: 5.22
Min: 2.01

In the lower quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

BLDR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	PAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.79	0.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.08	0.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.12	2.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	7.68	5.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

BLDR vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BLDR vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.56%
Q3: 1.94%
Median: 1.04%
Q1: 0.66%
Min: 0.00%

BLDR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PAC

2.53%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 7.48%
Q3: 3.76%
Median: 2.40%
Q1: 1.13%
Min: 0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BLDR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max: 157.36%
Q3: 77.74%
Median: 29.49%
Q1: 16.25%
Min: 0.00%

BLDR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PAC

71.16%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 197.82%
Q3: 109.11%
Median: 70.69%
Q1: 33.40%
Min: 0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.16% is within the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BLDR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	PAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	71.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

20.15

Building Products Industry

Max: 66.79
Q3: 37.37
Median: 21.86
Q1: 17.57
Min: 9.70

BLDR’s P/E Ratio of 20.15 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAC

19.76

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 35.90
Q3: 21.76
Median: 17.41
Q1: 12.31
Min: 5.46

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 19.76 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BLDR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.96

Building Products Industry

Max: 6.40
Q3: 3.25
Median: 1.65
Q1: 1.11
Min: 0.34

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s P/S Ratio of 0.96 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

PAC

4.58

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 10.76
Q3: 5.52
Median: 2.96
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.84

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BLDR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

3.09

Building Products Industry

Max: 13.31
Q3: 6.85
Median: 3.20
Q1: 1.71
Min: 0.73

BLDR’s P/B Ratio of 3.09 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PAC

9.90

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max: 4.46
Q3: 2.80
Median: 1.80
Q1: 1.12
Min: 0.37

At 9.90, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BLDR vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	PAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	20.15	19.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.96	4.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.09	9.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	12.82	18.23