Seek Returns logo

BLDR vs. MTZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BLDR and MTZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBLDRMTZ
Company NameBuilders FirstSource, Inc.MasTec, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization14.01 billion USD16.97 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 28, 2005February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BLDR and MTZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BLDR vs. MTZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBLDRMTZ
5-Day Price Return1.68%3.34%
13-Week Price Return3.91%24.87%
26-Week Price Return-6.00%73.41%
52-Week Price Return-37.58%73.30%
Month-to-Date Return-12.57%17.13%
Year-to-Date Return-15.17%56.32%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.24M0.95M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.16M0.91M
3-Month Volatility49.67%33.54%
Beta1.631.91

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BLDR

17.49%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

BLDR’s Return on Equity of 17.49% is on par with the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MTZ

9.20%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

MTZ’s Return on Equity of 9.20% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BLDR vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

4.74%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s Net Profit Margin of 4.74% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MTZ

2.04%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 2.04% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

BLDR vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

7.70%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

BLDR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.70% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MTZ

3.86%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.86% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BLDR vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBLDRMTZ
Return on Equity (TTM)17.49%9.20%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.82%2.97%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.74%2.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.70%3.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.58%12.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.79

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

BLDR’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MTZ

1.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BLDR vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.12

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

BLDR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.12. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MTZ

0.77

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

MTZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BLDR vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

7.68

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

BLDR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MTZ

2.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

BLDR vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBLDRMTZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.791.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.081.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.120.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.682.54

Growth

Revenue Growth

BLDR vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BLDR vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

BLDR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BLDR vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

BLDR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BLDR vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBLDRMTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

18.05

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

BLDR’s P/E Ratio of 18.05 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MTZ

62.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

At 62.85, MTZ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BLDR vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.86

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s P/S Ratio of 0.86 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

MTZ

1.28

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BLDR vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

3.09

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

BLDR’s P/B Ratio of 3.09 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MTZ

4.56

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BLDR vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBLDRMTZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.0562.85
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.861.28
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.094.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.4818.12