BLDR vs. FER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 30, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BLDR and FER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	BLDR	FER
Company Name	Builders FirstSource, Inc.	Ferrovial SE
Country	United States	Netherlands
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Building Products	Construction & Engineering
Market Capitalization	15.67 billion USD	39.59 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	June 28, 2005	August 13, 2012
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BLDR and FER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BLDR vs. FER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	FER
5-Day Price Return	6.41%	-1.37%
13-Week Price Return	27.14%	0.73%
26-Week Price Return	3.21%	8.74%
52-Week Price Return	-19.64%	25.21%
Month-to-Date Return	11.51%	4.19%
Year-to-Date Return	-0.82%	15.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume	2.04M	0.62M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.17M	0.66M
3-Month Volatility	49.50%	12.20%
Beta	1.68	0.92

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BLDR

17.49%

Building Products Industry

Max: 48.58%
Q3: 27.65%
Median: 16.01%
Q1: 8.81%
Min: -6.66%

BLDR’s Return on Equity of 17.49% is on par with the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FER

56.21%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 29.61%
Q3: 17.18%
Median: 10.42%
Q1: 8.10%
Min: -0.10%

FER’s Return on Equity of 56.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BLDR vs. FER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

4.74%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.11%
Q3: 15.09%
Median: 9.48%
Q1: 5.16%
Min: -3.43%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s Net Profit Margin of 4.74% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FER

35.99%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.14%
Q3: 6.17%
Median: 3.85%
Q1: 2.40%
Min: -0.05%

FER’s Net Profit Margin of 35.99% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

BLDR vs. FER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

7.70%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.67%
Q3: 18.75%
Median: 14.89%
Q1: 8.70%
Min: -1.00%

BLDR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.70% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FER

34.91%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.56%
Q3: 9.36%
Median: 5.46%
Q1: 3.47%
Min: -1.93%

FER’s Operating Profit Margin of 34.91% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

BLDR vs. FER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	FER
Return on Equity (TTM)	17.49%	56.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)	6.82%	12.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	4.74%	35.99%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	7.70%	34.91%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	31.58%	87.83%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.79

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.87
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.60
Q1: 1.32
Min: 0.88

BLDR’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FER

0.94

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 1.98
Q3: 1.53
Median: 1.24
Q1: 1.05
Min: 0.66

FER’s Current Ratio of 0.94 falls into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

BLDR vs. FER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.12

Building Products Industry

Max: 1.64
Q3: 1.02
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

BLDR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.12. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

FER

1.95

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.49
Q3: 1.19
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

FER’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Construction & Engineering industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.95. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

BLDR vs. FER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

7.68

Building Products Industry

Max: 72.12
Q3: 34.39
Median: 15.31
Q1: 6.06
Min: 0.85

BLDR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FER

9.20

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 23.59
Q3: 14.49
Median: 8.20
Q1: 5.26
Min: -6.49

FER’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BLDR vs. FER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	FER
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.79	0.94
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.08	0.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.12	1.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	7.68	9.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

BLDR vs. FER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BLDR vs. FER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.56%
Q3: 1.94%
Median: 1.04%
Q1: 0.66%
Min: 0.00%

BLDR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FER

0.36%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 6.28%
Q3: 3.25%
Median: 2.02%
Q1: 0.23%
Min: 0.00%

FER’s Dividend Yield of 0.36% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BLDR vs. FER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max: 157.36%
Q3: 77.74%
Median: 29.49%
Q1: 16.25%
Min: 0.00%

BLDR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FER

3.63%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 69.47%
Median: 40.99%
Q1: 10.51%
Min: 0.00%

FER’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 3.63% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

BLDR vs. FER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	FER
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.36%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	3.63%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

20.15

Building Products Industry

Max: 66.79
Q3: 37.37
Median: 21.86
Q1: 17.57
Min: 9.70

BLDR’s P/E Ratio of 20.15 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

FER

10.03

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.96
Q3: 24.81
Median: 15.45
Q1: 12.51
Min: 2.74

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, FER’s P/E Ratio of 10.03 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

BLDR vs. FER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.96

Building Products Industry

Max: 6.40
Q3: 3.25
Median: 1.65
Q1: 1.11
Min: 0.34

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s P/S Ratio of 0.96 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FER

3.61

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 3.22
Q3: 1.63
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.48
Min: 0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 3.61, FER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction & Engineering industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BLDR vs. FER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

3.09

Building Products Industry

Max: 13.31
Q3: 6.85
Median: 3.20
Q1: 1.71
Min: 0.73

BLDR’s P/B Ratio of 3.09 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

FER

5.63

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.74
Q3: 3.33
Median: 1.49
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.23

FER’s P/B Ratio of 5.63 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BLDR vs. FER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	FER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	20.15	10.03
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.96	3.61
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.09	5.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	12.82	29.43