BLDR vs. EME: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 24, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BLDR and EME, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	BLDR	EME
Company Name	Builders FirstSource, Inc.	EMCOR Group, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Building Products	Construction & Engineering
Market Capitalization	14.68 billion USD	27.09 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 28, 2005	January 10, 1995
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BLDR and EME by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BLDR vs. EME: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	EME
5-Day Price Return	-4.33%	-0.76%
13-Week Price Return	14.51%	28.75%
26-Week Price Return	-8.36%	41.53%
52-Week Price Return	-14.26%	64.20%
Month-to-Date Return	8.67%	-3.56%
Year-to-Date Return	-3.34%	33.32%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.94M	0.28M
3-Month Avg. Volume	2.14M	0.43M
3-Month Volatility	48.27%	28.32%
Beta	1.67	1.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BLDR

17.49%

Building Products Industry

Max: 48.58%
Q3: 27.65%
Median: 16.01%
Q1: 8.81%
Min: -6.66%

BLDR’s Return on Equity of 17.49% is on par with the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

EME

37.80%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 29.61%
Q3: 17.18%
Median: 10.42%
Q1: 8.10%
Min: -0.10%

EME’s Return on Equity of 37.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BLDR vs. EME: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

4.74%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.11%
Q3: 15.09%
Median: 9.48%
Q1: 5.16%
Min: -3.43%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s Net Profit Margin of 4.74% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

EME

7.07%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.14%
Q3: 6.17%
Median: 3.85%
Q1: 2.40%
Min: -0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.07% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BLDR vs. EME: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

7.70%

Building Products Industry

Max: 26.67%
Q3: 18.75%
Median: 14.89%
Q1: 8.70%
Min: -1.00%

BLDR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.70% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

EME

9.50%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.56%
Q3: 9.36%
Median: 5.46%
Q1: 3.47%
Min: -1.93%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.50% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BLDR vs. EME: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	EME
Return on Equity (TTM)	17.49%	37.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)	6.82%	14.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	4.74%	7.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	7.70%	9.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	31.58%	19.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.79

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.87
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.60
Q1: 1.32
Min: 0.88

BLDR’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EME

1.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 1.98
Q3: 1.53
Median: 1.24
Q1: 1.05
Min: 0.66

EME’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BLDR vs. EME: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.12

Building Products Industry

Max: 1.64
Q3: 1.02
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

BLDR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.12. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

EME

0.08

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.49
Q3: 1.19
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, EME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BLDR vs. EME: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

7.68

Building Products Industry

Max: 72.12
Q3: 34.39
Median: 15.31
Q1: 6.06
Min: 0.85

BLDR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EME

490.27

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 23.59
Q3: 14.49
Median: 8.20
Q1: 5.26
Min: -6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 490.27, EME demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

BLDR vs. EME: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	EME
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.79	1.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.08	1.13
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.12	0.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	7.68	490.27

Growth

Revenue Growth

BLDR vs. EME: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BLDR vs. EME: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max: 2.56%
Q3: 1.94%
Median: 1.04%
Q1: 0.66%
Min: 0.00%

BLDR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EME

0.17%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 6.28%
Q3: 3.25%
Median: 2.02%
Q1: 0.23%
Min: 0.00%

EME’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BLDR vs. EME: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max: 157.36%
Q3: 77.74%
Median: 29.49%
Q1: 16.25%
Min: 0.00%

BLDR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EME

4.14%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 69.47%
Median: 40.99%
Q1: 10.51%
Min: 0.00%

EME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.14% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

BLDR vs. EME: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	EME
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.17%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	4.14%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

20.15

Building Products Industry

Max: 66.79
Q3: 37.37
Median: 21.86
Q1: 17.57
Min: 9.70

BLDR’s P/E Ratio of 20.15 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

EME

24.48

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.96
Q3: 24.81
Median: 15.45
Q1: 12.51
Min: 2.74

EME’s P/E Ratio of 24.48 is within the middle range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BLDR vs. EME: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.96

Building Products Industry

Max: 6.40
Q3: 3.25
Median: 1.65
Q1: 1.11
Min: 0.34

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s P/S Ratio of 0.96 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

EME

1.73

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 3.22
Q3: 1.63
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.48
Min: 0.11

EME’s P/S Ratio of 1.73 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BLDR vs. EME: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

3.09

Building Products Industry

Max: 13.31
Q3: 6.85
Median: 3.20
Q1: 1.71
Min: 0.73

BLDR’s P/B Ratio of 3.09 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

EME

7.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.74
Q3: 3.33
Median: 1.49
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.23

At 7.85, EME’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BLDR vs. EME: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BLDR	EME
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	20.15	24.48
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.96	1.73
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.09	7.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	12.82	22.38