Seek Returns logo

BLDR vs. CTAS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BLDR and CTAS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBLDRCTAS
Company NameBuilders FirstSource, Inc.Cintas Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsCommercial Services & Supplies
Market Capitalization14.01 billion USD82.30 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 28, 2005August 19, 1983
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BLDR and CTAS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BLDR vs. CTAS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBLDRCTAS
5-Day Price Return1.68%2.61%
13-Week Price Return3.91%-7.90%
26-Week Price Return-6.00%0.27%
52-Week Price Return-37.58%1.44%
Month-to-Date Return-12.57%-2.27%
Year-to-Date Return-15.17%12.35%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.24M2.47M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.16M1.67M
3-Month Volatility49.67%18.58%
Beta1.631.00

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BLDR

17.49%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

BLDR’s Return on Equity of 17.49% is on par with the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CTAS

41.21%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
16.86%
Median
10.28%
Q1
6.63%
Min
0.71%

CTAS’s Return on Equity of 41.21% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BLDR vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

4.74%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s Net Profit Margin of 4.74% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CTAS

17.53%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
16.98%
Q3
9.05%
Median
5.35%
Q1
3.42%
Min
-2.31%

CTAS’s Net Profit Margin of 17.53% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

BLDR vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

7.70%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

BLDR’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.70% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CTAS

22.82%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
23.33%
Q3
12.51%
Median
8.33%
Q1
4.45%
Min
-2.90%

An Operating Profit Margin of 22.82% places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BLDR vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBLDRCTAS
Return on Equity (TTM)17.49%41.21%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.82%19.14%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.74%17.53%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.70%22.82%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)31.58%50.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.79

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

BLDR’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CTAS

2.09

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.13
Median
1.31
Q1
0.91
Min
0.59

CTAS’s Current Ratio of 2.09 aligns with the median group of the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BLDR vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.12

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

BLDR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.12. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CTAS

0.52

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.14
Median
0.76
Q1
0.36
Min
0.00

CTAS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.52 is typical for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BLDR vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

7.68

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

BLDR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CTAS

24.70

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
24.70
Q3
13.44
Median
9.06
Q1
3.42
Min
-10.97

CTAS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 24.70 is in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

BLDR vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBLDRCTAS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.792.09
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.081.71
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.120.52
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.6824.70

Growth

Revenue Growth

BLDR vs. CTAS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BLDR vs. CTAS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

BLDR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CTAS

0.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
3.65%
Q3
2.43%
Median
1.58%
Q1
0.74%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Yield of 0.75% is consistent with its peers in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BLDR vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

BLDR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CTAS

33.75%

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
137.88%
Q3
73.07%
Median
44.79%
Q1
27.66%
Min
0.00%

CTAS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 33.75% is within the typical range for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BLDR vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBLDRCTAS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.75%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%33.75%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

18.05

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

BLDR’s P/E Ratio of 18.05 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CTAS

45.27

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
57.87
Q3
33.40
Median
23.56
Q1
15.28
Min
6.56

A P/E Ratio of 45.27 places CTAS in the upper quartile for the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

BLDR vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.86

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s P/S Ratio of 0.86 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CTAS

7.94

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
4.84
Q3
2.58
Median
1.09
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06

With a P/S Ratio of 7.94, CTAS trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

BLDR vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

3.09

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

BLDR’s P/B Ratio of 3.09 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CTAS

19.50

Commercial Services & Supplies Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.97
Median
2.44
Q1
1.60
Min
0.40

At 19.50, CTAS’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Commercial Services & Supplies industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BLDR vs. CTAS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Commercial Services & Supplies industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBLDRCTAS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.0545.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.867.94
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.0919.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.4846.70