Seek Returns logo

BLDR vs. CAT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BLDR and CAT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBLDRCAT
Company NameBuilders FirstSource, Inc.Caterpillar Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsMachinery
Market Capitalization11.84 billion USD267.43 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 28, 2005January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BLDR and CAT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BLDR vs. CAT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBLDRCAT
5-Day Price Return-2.49%4.25%
13-Week Price Return-16.85%39.73%
26-Week Price Return1.01%78.23%
52-Week Price Return-40.25%39.84%
Month-to-Date Return-7.84%-1.11%
Year-to-Date Return-25.10%57.36%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.49M3.03M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.01M2.94M
3-Month Volatility46.02%34.91%
Beta1.581.57

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BLDR

13.84%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

BLDR’s Return on Equity of 13.84% is on par with the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CAT

48.25%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

CAT’s Return on Equity of 48.25% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Machinery industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BLDR vs. CAT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

3.79%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.79% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

CAT

14.34%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.34% places CAT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BLDR vs. CAT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BLDR

6.57%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

BLDR’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.57% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CAT

17.65%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 17.65% places CAT in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BLDR vs. CAT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBLDRCAT
Return on Equity (TTM)13.84%48.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)5.29%10.40%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.79%14.34%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.57%17.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.97%35.53%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.79

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

BLDR’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CAT

1.38

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

CAT’s Current Ratio of 1.38 aligns with the median group of the Machinery industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BLDR vs. CAT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

1.03

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

BLDR’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.03. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

CAT

2.01

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.01, CAT operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Machinery industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

BLDR vs. CAT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

7.68

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

BLDR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CAT

12.53

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

CAT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.53 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BLDR vs. CAT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBLDRCAT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.791.38
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.150.78
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.032.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.6812.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

BLDR vs. CAT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BLDR vs. CAT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

BLDR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CAT

1.03%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

CAT’s Dividend Yield of 1.03% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BLDR vs. CAT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.00%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

BLDR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CAT

29.36%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

CAT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 29.36% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

BLDR vs. CAT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBLDRCAT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.03%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%29.36%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

20.37

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

BLDR’s P/E Ratio of 20.37 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CAT

28.47

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

CAT’s P/E Ratio of 28.47 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BLDR vs. CAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BLDR

0.77

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, BLDR’s P/S Ratio of 0.77 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CAT

4.08

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

CAT’s P/S Ratio of 4.08 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BLDR vs. CAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BLDR

3.11

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

BLDR’s P/B Ratio of 3.11 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CAT

10.82

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

At 10.82, CAT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BLDR vs. CAT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBLDRCAT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.3728.47
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.774.08
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.1110.82
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.8627.57