BLD vs. STN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 20, 2025

Here’s a clear look at BLD and STN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	BLD	STN
Company Name	TopBuild Corp.	Stantec Inc.
Country	United States	Canada
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Industrials
GICS Industry	Household Durables	Construction & Engineering
Market Capitalization	12.47 billion USD	12.40 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	June 17, 2015	August 5, 2005
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BLD and STN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BLD vs. STN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	BLD	STN
5-Day Price Return	7.29%	-0.96%
13-Week Price Return	42.04%	14.45%
26-Week Price Return	30.64%	37.34%
52-Week Price Return	18.51%	38.53%
Month-to-Date Return	19.67%	-0.75%
Year-to-Date Return	42.39%	33.29%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.52M	0.31M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.40M	0.27M
3-Month Volatility	40.62%	18.10%
Beta	1.70	0.98

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BLD

27.70%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 26.99%
Q3: 17.28%
Median: 12.66%
Q1: 7.34%
Min: 0.07%

BLD’s Return on Equity of 27.70% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

STN

15.34%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 29.61%
Q3: 17.18%
Median: 10.42%
Q1: 8.10%
Min: -0.10%

STN’s Return on Equity of 15.34% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BLD vs. STN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BLD

11.40%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 15.50%
Q3: 8.99%
Median: 6.57%
Q1: 4.33%
Min: -0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.40% places BLD in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

STN

7.63%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.14%
Q3: 6.17%
Median: 3.85%
Q1: 2.40%
Min: -0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.63% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BLD vs. STN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BLD

16.46%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 20.22%
Q3: 12.29%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 6.30%
Min: -1.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.46% places BLD in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

STN

9.84%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.56%
Q3: 9.36%
Median: 5.46%
Q1: 3.47%
Min: -1.93%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.84% places STN in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BLD vs. STN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	BLD	STN
Return on Equity (TTM)	27.70%	15.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)	12.45%	6.37%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	11.40%	7.63%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	16.46%	9.84%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	30.17%	66.77%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BLD

2.83

Household Durables Industry

Max: 9.23
Q3: 4.50
Median: 2.35
Q1: 1.29
Min: 0.70

BLD’s Current Ratio of 2.83 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

STN

1.29

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 1.98
Q3: 1.53
Median: 1.24
Q1: 1.05
Min: 0.66

STN’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BLD vs. STN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BLD

0.88

Household Durables Industry

Max: 1.84
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.34
Q1: 0.19
Min: 0.00

BLD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

STN

0.69

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.49
Q3: 1.19
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

STN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.69 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BLD vs. STN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BLD

12.50

Household Durables Industry

Max: 140.40
Q3: 77.14
Median: 24.53
Q1: 5.69
Min: -17.01

BLD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.50 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

STN

60.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 23.59
Q3: 14.49
Median: 8.20
Q1: 5.26
Min: -6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 60.60, STN demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

BLD vs. STN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	BLD	STN
Current Ratio (MRQ)	2.83	1.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	2.23	1.26
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.88	0.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	12.50	60.60

Growth

Revenue Growth

BLD vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BLD vs. STN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BLD

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 8.95%
Q3: 4.19%
Median: 1.88%
Q1: 0.03%
Min: 0.00%

BLD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

STN

0.56%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 6.28%
Q3: 3.25%
Median: 2.02%
Q1: 0.23%
Min: 0.00%

STN’s Dividend Yield of 0.56% is consistent with its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

BLD vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BLD

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max: 125.12%
Q3: 62.43%
Median: 39.18%
Q1: 5.55%
Min: 0.00%

BLD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

STN

20.71%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 69.47%
Median: 40.99%
Q1: 10.51%
Min: 0.00%

STN’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 20.71% is within the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

BLD vs. STN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	BLD	STN
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.56%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	20.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BLD

21.04

Household Durables Industry

Max: 29.75
Q3: 18.88
Median: 13.25
Q1: 9.26
Min: 6.32

A P/E Ratio of 21.04 places BLD in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

STN

37.15

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.96
Q3: 24.81
Median: 15.45
Q1: 12.51
Min: 2.74

At 37.15, STN’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BLD vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BLD

2.40

Household Durables Industry

Max: 2.12
Q3: 1.21
Median: 0.83
Q1: 0.51
Min: 0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 2.40, BLD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

STN

2.83

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 3.22
Q3: 1.63
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.48
Min: 0.11

STN’s P/S Ratio of 2.83 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BLD vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BLD

4.32

Household Durables Industry

Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.29
Median: 1.34
Q1: 0.98
Min: 0.59

At 4.32, BLD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

STN

4.38

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.74
Q3: 3.33
Median: 1.49
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.23

STN’s P/B Ratio of 4.38 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BLD vs. STN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	BLD	STN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	21.04	37.15
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.40	2.83
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	4.32	4.38
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	15.73	31.05