Seek Returns logo

BLD vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BLD and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBLDPWR
Company NameTopBuild Corp.Quanta Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization11.19 billion USD62.76 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 17, 2015February 12, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BLD and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BLD vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBLDPWR
5-Day Price Return1.70%2.95%
13-Week Price Return15.66%8.97%
26-Week Price Return30.23%65.70%
52-Week Price Return-0.32%40.82%
Month-to-Date Return1.70%1.63%
Year-to-Date Return27.68%33.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.31M0.94M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.40M1.06M
3-Month Volatility33.53%25.03%
Beta1.691.15

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BLD

27.70%

Household Durables Industry

Max
27.70%
Q3
17.40%
Median
12.87%
Q1
7.33%
Min
-5.50%

In the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, BLD’s Return on Equity of 27.70% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BLD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BLD

11.40%

Household Durables Industry

Max
16.37%
Q3
9.18%
Median
6.63%
Q1
3.85%
Min
-3.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.40% places BLD in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

BLD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BLD

16.46%

Household Durables Industry

Max
21.32%
Q3
12.25%
Median
9.93%
Q1
5.57%
Min
-1.07%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.46% places BLD in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BLD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBLDPWR
Return on Equity (TTM)27.70%13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.45%5.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.40%3.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.46%5.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.17%15.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BLD

2.83

Household Durables Industry

Max
6.09
Q3
3.79
Median
2.54
Q1
1.23
Min
0.83

BLD’s Current Ratio of 2.83 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BLD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BLD

0.88

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.89
Q3
0.87
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

BLD’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Household Durables industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BLD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BLD

12.50

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

BLD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.50 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

BLD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBLDPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.831.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.231.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.880.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.5010.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

BLD vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BLD vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BLD

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.61%
Q3
3.97%
Median
2.00%
Q1
0.18%
Min
0.00%

BLD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PWR

0.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BLD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BLD

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
129.55%
Q3
65.55%
Median
42.15%
Q1
6.45%
Min
0.00%

BLD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

BLD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBLDPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%5.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BLD

18.77

Household Durables Industry

Max
33.67
Q3
19.33
Median
12.58
Q1
9.62
Min
6.48

BLD’s P/E Ratio of 18.77 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PWR

63.96

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

At 63.96, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BLD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BLD

2.14

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.39
Median
0.90
Q1
0.54
Min
0.19

BLD’s P/S Ratio of 2.14 is in the upper echelon for the Household Durables industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PWR

2.39

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.39 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BLD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BLD

4.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
3.26
Q3
2.01
Median
1.38
Q1
1.00
Min
0.58

At 4.32, BLD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

PWR’s P/B Ratio of 7.13 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BLD vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBLDPWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.7763.96
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.142.39
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.327.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.0445.76