Seek Returns logo

BLD vs. MTZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BLD and MTZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBLDMTZ
Company NameTopBuild Corp.MasTec, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization11.84 billion USD13.61 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 17, 2015February 21, 1973
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BLD and MTZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BLD vs. MTZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBLDMTZ
5-Day Price Return-2.21%-3.08%
13-Week Price Return42.63%9.63%
26-Week Price Return34.67%25.97%
52-Week Price Return16.49%52.42%
Month-to-Date Return17.03%-8.83%
Year-to-Date Return39.24%26.72%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.42M0.84M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.39M0.90M
3-Month Volatility38.53%28.73%
Beta1.691.83

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BLD

27.70%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

BLD’s Return on Equity of 27.70% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MTZ

9.20%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

MTZ’s Return on Equity of 9.20% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

BLD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BLD

11.40%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.40% places BLD in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MTZ

2.04%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 2.04% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

BLD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BLD

16.46%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.46% places BLD in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MTZ

3.86%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.86% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

BLD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBLDMTZ
Return on Equity (TTM)27.70%9.20%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.45%2.97%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.40%2.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.46%3.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.17%12.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BLD

2.83

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

BLD’s Current Ratio of 2.83 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MTZ

1.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BLD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BLD

0.88

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

BLD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MTZ

0.77

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

MTZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

BLD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BLD

12.50

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

BLD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.50 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MTZ

2.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

BLD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBLDMTZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.831.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.231.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.880.77
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.502.54

Growth

Revenue Growth

BLD vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BLD vs. MTZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BLD

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

BLD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

BLD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BLD

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

BLD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

BLD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBLDMTZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BLD

19.83

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 19.83 places BLD in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MTZ

51.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 51.22, MTZ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

BLD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BLD

2.26

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 2.26, BLD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MTZ

1.04

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

BLD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BLD

4.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

At 4.32, BLD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MTZ

4.56

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

BLD vs. MTZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBLDMTZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.8351.22
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.261.04
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.324.56
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.8314.77