Seek Returns logo

BLD vs. EME: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at BLD and EME, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolBLDEME
Company NameTopBuild Corp.EMCOR Group, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryIndustrials
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization12.47 billion USD27.61 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 17, 2015January 10, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of BLD and EME by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

BLD vs. EME: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolBLDEME
5-Day Price Return7.29%-0.13%
13-Week Price Return42.04%34.86%
26-Week Price Return30.64%32.01%
52-Week Price Return18.51%73.33%
Month-to-Date Return19.67%-1.72%
Year-to-Date Return42.39%35.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.52M0.38M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.40M0.47M
3-Month Volatility40.62%29.57%
Beta1.701.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

BLD

27.70%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

BLD’s Return on Equity of 27.70% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

EME

37.80%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

EME’s Return on Equity of 37.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

BLD vs. EME: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

BLD

11.40%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 11.40% places BLD in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

EME

7.07%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.07% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

BLD vs. EME: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

BLD

16.46%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.46% places BLD in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

EME

9.50%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.50% places EME in the upper quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

BLD vs. EME: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolBLDEME
Return on Equity (TTM)27.70%37.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.45%14.03%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)11.40%7.07%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.46%9.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)30.17%19.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

BLD

2.83

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

BLD’s Current Ratio of 2.83 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

EME

1.18

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

EME’s Current Ratio of 1.18 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

BLD vs. EME: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

BLD

0.88

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

BLD’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

EME

0.08

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, EME’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

BLD vs. EME: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

BLD

12.50

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

BLD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.50 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

EME

490.27

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 490.27, EME demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

BLD vs. EME: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolBLDEME
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.831.18
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.231.13
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.880.08
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)12.50490.27

Growth

Revenue Growth

BLD vs. EME: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

BLD vs. EME: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

BLD

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

BLD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

EME

0.17%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Yield of 0.17% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

BLD vs. EME: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

BLD

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

BLD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

EME

4.14%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

EME’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.14% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

BLD vs. EME: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolBLDEME
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.17%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%4.14%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

BLD

21.04

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

A P/E Ratio of 21.04 places BLD in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

EME

24.61

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

EME’s P/E Ratio of 24.61 is within the middle range for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

BLD vs. EME: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

BLD

2.40

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 2.40, BLD trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

EME

1.74

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

EME’s P/S Ratio of 1.74 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

BLD vs. EME: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

BLD

4.32

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

At 4.32, BLD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

EME

7.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.85, EME’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

BLD vs. EME: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolBLDEME
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)21.0424.61
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.401.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.327.85
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.7322.51