BKR vs. VLO: Baker Hughes vs. Valero Energy Stock Comparison
How do Baker Hughes (BKR) and Valero Energy (VLO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Baker Hughes (BKR) and Valero Energy (VLO) both fall under the Energy industry group, but BKR is classified in Energy Equipment & Services while VLO is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels.
| Profile Item | BKR | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Baker Hughes Company | Valero Energy Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Energy Equipment & Services | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Capitalization | 47.54 billion USD | 96.62 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | April 6, 1987 | January 4, 1982 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | BKR | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 3.17% | 107.71% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.12% | 47.89% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.57% | 39.74% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | BKR | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 35.34% | 39.31% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.10 | 0.60 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -46.53% | -41.22% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 7.67M | 3.05M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | BKR | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.03 | 2.63 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.04 | 4.08 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Valero Energy (VLO) at 46.87% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 15.06% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for VLO.
BKR
Energy industry group
15.06%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- BKR
- 15.06%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
VLO
Energy industry group
46.87%
- Max
- 53.85%
- VLO
- 46.87%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 10.08% and Valero Energy (VLO) at 8.83% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
10.08%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- BKR
- 10.08%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
VLO
Energy industry group
8.83%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- VLO
- 8.83%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 11.29% and Valero Energy (VLO) at 20.47% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
BKR
Energy industry group
11.29%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- BKR
- 11.29%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
VLO
Energy industry group
20.47%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- VLO
- 20.47%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | BKR | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 15.06% | 46.87% |
| ROA (TTM) | 4.46% | 17.68% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.08% | 8.83% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 11.29% | 20.47% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 23.70% | 19.52% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at -0.35% and Valero Energy (VLO) at -5.54% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at -12.75% and Valero Energy (VLO) at -11.77% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | BKR | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -0.35% | -5.54% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 9.44% | -11.40% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -12.75% | -11.77% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | -36.12% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.24 and Valero Energy (VLO) at 1.72 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.24
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- BKR
- 1.24
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
VLO
Energy industry group
1.72
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- VLO
- 1.72
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 0.89 and Valero Energy (VLO) at 0.35 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
BKR
Energy industry group
0.89
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- BKR
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
VLO
Energy industry group
0.35
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- VLO
- 0.35
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | BKR | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.24 | 1.72 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.89 | 0.35 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.57 | 0.06 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.99% and Valero Energy (VLO) at 1.35% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.99%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- BKR
- 1.99%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VLO
Energy industry group
1.35%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- VLO
- 1.35%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 31.62% and Valero Energy (VLO) at 10.76% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
BKR
Energy industry group
31.62%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- BKR
- 31.62%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
VLO
Energy industry group
10.76%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- VLO
- 10.76%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | BKR | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.99% | 1.35% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.62% | 10.76% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Baker Hughes (BKR) at 16.45 and Valero Energy (VLO) at 7.88 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
BKR
Energy industry group
16.45
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- BKR
- 16.45
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
VLO
Energy industry group
7.88
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- VLO
- 7.88
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Valero Energy (VLO) at 0.66 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Baker Hughes (BKR) at 1.65 prices around its industry’s middle — VLO costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
BKR
Energy industry group
1.65
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- BKR
- 1.65
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
VLO
Energy industry group
0.66
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- VLO
- 0.66
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Baker Hughes (BKR) at 2.36 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Valero Energy (VLO) at 3.45 carries an above-peer premium to book — VLO is pricier on assets.
BKR
Energy industry group
2.36
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- BKR
- 2.36
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
VLO
Energy industry group
3.45
- Max
- 4.21
- VLO
- 3.45
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BKR | VLO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 16.45 | 7.88 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.65 | 0.66 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.36 | 3.45 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 10.69% | 13.02% |